Paper · 2016 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Functional analysis of a wheat pleiotropic drug resistance gene involved in Fusarium head blight resistance

Gui-ping WANG; Wen-qian HOU; Lei ZHANG; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) sub-family of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) transporter had been reported to participate in diverse biological processes of plant. In this study, we cloned three novel PDR genes in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840, which were located on wheat chromosomes 6A, 6B and 6D. In phylogeny, these genes were members of cluster I together with AePDR7 and BdPDR7. Subcellular localization analysis showed that TaPDR7 was expressed on the plasmalemma. The quantitative real time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis showed that this gene and its probable orthologues in chromosomes 6B and 6D were both up-regulated sharply at 48 h after infected by Fusarium graminearum and trichothecene deoxynivalenol (DON) in spike. When knocking down the transcripts of all TaPDR7 members by barely stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing (BSMV-VIGS) system, it could promote the F. graminearum hyphae growth and made larger pathogen inoculation points in Ning 7840, which suggested that TaPDR7 might play an important role in response to F. graminearum. Although salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and abscisic acid (ABA) had been reported to possibly regulate wheat FHB resistance, here, we found that the three members of TaPDR7 were negatively regulated by these three hormones but positively regulated by indoleacetic acid (IAA).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three novel PDR genes were cloned from the FHB-resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840 and located on wheat chromosomes 6A, 6B and 6D.

Material
Ning 7840e1
Gene
PDR genese2
Outcome
located on wheat chromosomese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“we cloned three novel PDR genes in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840, which were located on wheat chromosomes 6A, 6B and 6D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three PDR genes are members of phylogenetic cluster I together with AePDR7 and BdPDR7.

Gene
AePDR7e3
Outcome
members of cluster Ie3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e3

“these genes were members of cluster I together with AePDR7 and BdPDR7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–442 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TaPDR7 is expressed on the plasmalemma.

Gene
TaPDR7e4
Outcome
Subcellular localizatione4
Qualifier
expressed on the plasmalemmae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e4

“Subcellular localization analysis showed that TaPDR7 was expressed on the plasmalemma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TaPDR7 and its probable orthologues were sharply up-regulated in spikes 48 h after F. graminearum and DON infection.

Organ / stage
spikee5
Treatment
infected by Fusarium graminearum and trichothecene deoxynivalenol (DON)e5
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume5pathogen
Outcome
this gene and its probable orthologuese5
Direction
up-regulatede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e5

“this gene and its probable orthologues in chromosomes 6B and 6D were both up-regulated sharply at 48 h after infected by Fusarium graminearum and trichothecene deoxynivalenol (DON) in spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knocking down all TaPDR7 members promoted F. graminearum hyphae growth in Ning 7840.

Treatment
knocking down the transcripts of all TaPDR7 members by barely stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing (BSMV-VIGS) systeme6
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume6pathogen
Outcome
F. graminearum hyphae growthe6
Direction
promotee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e6

“When knocking down the transcripts of all TaPDR7 members by barely stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing (BSMV-VIGS) system, it could promote the F. graminearum hyphae growth and made larger pathogen inoculation points in Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knocking down all TaPDR7 members produced larger pathogen inoculation points in Ning 7840.

Treatment
knocking down the transcripts of all TaPDR7 members by barely stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing (BSMV-VIGS) systeme6
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume6pathogen
Outcome
pathogen inoculation pointse6
Direction
made largere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e6

“When knocking down the transcripts of all TaPDR7 members by barely stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing (BSMV-VIGS) system, it could promote the F. graminearum hyphae growth and made larger pathogen inoculation points in Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid, methyl jasmonate and abscisic acid negatively regulate the three TaPDR7 members.

Treatment
salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and abscisic acid (ABA)e7
Gene
TaPDR7e3
Outcome
the three members of TaPDR7e3
Direction
negatively regulatede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e7

“Although salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and abscisic acid (ABA) had been reported to possibly regulate wheat FHB resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1246 · show in text ↑
e3

“here, we found that the three members of TaPDR7 were negatively regulated by these three hormones but positively regulated by indoleacetic acid (IAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoleacetic acid positively regulates the three TaPDR7 members.

Treatment
indoleacetic acid (IAA)e3
Gene
TaPDR7e3
Outcome
the three members of TaPDR7e3
Direction
positively regulatede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant wheat cultivar Ning 7840”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–302 · show in text ↑
e3

“here, we found that the three members of TaPDR7 were negatively regulated by these three hormones but positively regulated by indoleacetic acid (IAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1397 · show in text ↑

loss of function · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 40 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.