Paper · 1958 · Annals of Botany

Physiological Causes of Differences in Grain Yield between Varieties of Barley

D. J. WATSON; GILLIAN N. THORNE; S. A. W. FRENCH

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
73
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a field experiment on barley at Rothamsted with the high mean yield of 49 cwt. of grain per acre, the varieties Proctor and Herta produced 10—15 per cent, more grain than Plumage-Archer on plots that received no nitrogenous fertilizer. When nitrogen was applied the difference was increased to about 30 per cent., because the higher nitrogen supply caused the Plumage-Archer crop to lodge and did not increase its yield, while Proctor and Herta remained standing. The three varieties did not differ in leaf-area index nor in net assimilation rate before ear emergence, so that all had the same total dry weight. After ear emergence, the leaf-area indices of Proctor and Plumage-Archer were nearly equal, but that of Herta was smaller. Assuming that the photosynthetic efficiency of the leaves continued to be the same in all varieties, the higher grain yields of Proctor and Herta cannot be attributed to greater production of dry matter by the leaves, either before or after ear emergence. A pot experiment on plants with shaded ears confirmed that the dry matter contributed to grain yield by unit leaf area was nearly equal in all the varieties. The higher grain yield of Proctor and Herta than of Plumage-Archer must therefore have come from additional photosynthesis in parts of the plant other than the leaves, i.e. in the ears themselves. An attempt to demonstrate this directly in a pot experiment, by comparing the grain yields of plants with shaded or with unshaded ears, was unsuccessful because the varieties behaved differently in pots; Proctor and Herta produced only about 6 per cent, more grain yield than Plumage-Archer, and though the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. The sum of ear sizes (estimated from length and breadth measurements) per m.1 in the field experiment was greater for Proctor and Herta than for Plumage-Archer. Also the distribution of dry matter between developing ears and shoots apparently differed with variety, so that at ear emergence the dry weight of ears per m.2 was greater in the two higher yielding varieties. The increased amount of photosynthetic tissue in the ears of Proctor and Herta, as measured by size or weight, may not wholly explain their greater dry-matter production; ears of Herta may also have a higher photosynthetic efficiency. No differences in nutrient uptake that could account for the varietal differences in grain yield were found. Plumage-Archer absorbed more potassium, and Herta less phosphorus than the other varieties. About a quarter of the final content of nitrogen, and a third of the phosphorus, was absorbed after ear emergence, but the potassium content was nearly maximal at ear emergence and later decreased. The pot experiment showed that, on the average of all varieties, 26 per cent. of the dry matter in the grain at harvest originated from photosynthesis in the ears, including 10 per cent, from the awns; 59 per cent, came from photosynthesis in the flag-leaf lamina and sheath and peduncle, and 15 per cent, from parts of the shoot below the flag leaf.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proctor and Herta yielded 10—15 per cent more grain than Plumage-Archer without nitrogen fertilizer.

Material
Proctor and Hertae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
moree0
Value
10—15 per cente0
Comparator
Plumage-Archere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the varieties Proctor and Herta produced 10—15 per cent, more grain than Plumage-Archer on plots that received no nitrogenous fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased the varietal grain yield difference to about 30 per cent.

Treatment
nitrogen was appliede0
Outcome
differencee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 30 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When nitrogen was applied the difference was increased to about 30 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen caused Plumage-Archer lodging without increasing its yield.

Material
Plumage-Archere0
Treatment
higher nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
crop to lodgee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher nitrogen supply caused the Plumage-Archer crop to lodge and did not increase its yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proctor and Herta remained standing under higher nitrogen.

Material
Proctor and Hertae0
Outcome
remained standinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while Proctor and Herta remained standing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three varieties had similar leaf-area index, net assimilation rate and total dry weight before ear emergence.

Organ / stage
before ear emergencee0
Outcome
leaf-area index nor in net assimilation ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The three varieties did not differ in leaf-area index nor in net assimilation rate before ear emergence, so that all had the same total dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After ear emergence Herta had a smaller leaf-area index than Proctor and Plumage-Archer.

Material
Hertae0
Outcome
leaf-area indicese0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
Proctor and Plumage-Archere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After ear emergence, the leaf-area indices of Proctor and Plumage-Archer were nearly equal, but that of Herta was smaller.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded-ear pot experiment found nearly equal dry matter contribution per leaf area across varieties.

Treatment
shaded earse0
Outcome
dry matter contributed to grain yield by unit leaf areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment on plants with shaded ears confirmed that the dry matter contributed to grain yield by unit leaf area was nearly equal in all the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed higher yield to photosynthesis by the ears.

Material
Proctor and Hertae0
Outcome
higher grain yielde0
Qualifier
additional photosynthesis in parts of the plant other than the leavese0
Comparator
Plumage-Archere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher grain yield of Proctor and Herta than of Plumage-Archer must therefore have come from additional photosynthesis in parts of the plant other than the leaves, i.e. in the ears themselves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots, Proctor and Herta yielded only about 6 per cent more than Plumage-Archer.

Material
Proctor and Hertae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
about 6 per cente0
Comparator
Plumage-Archere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proctor and Herta produced only about 6 per cent, more grain yield than Plumage-Archer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.

Treatment
shading the earse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field ear sizes were greater for Proctor and Herta than Plumage-Archer.

Material
Proctor and Hertae0
Outcome
sum of ear sizese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Plumage-Archere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sum of ear sizes (estimated from length and breadth measurements) per m.1 in the field experiment was greater for Proctor and Herta than for Plumage-Archer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear dry weight at emergence was greater in the higher yielding varieties.

Organ / stage
ear emergencee0
Outcome
dry weight of ears per m.2e0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at ear emergence the dry weight of ears per m.2 was greater in the two higher yielding varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2056–2153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herta ears may have higher photosynthetic efficiency.

Material
Hertae0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ears of Herta may also have a higher photosynthetic efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2325–2388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plumage-Archer absorbed more potassium.

Material
Plumage-Archere0
Outcome
absorbed more potassiume0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plumage-Archer absorbed more potassium, and Herta less phosphorus than the other varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2498–2589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herta absorbed less phosphorus than the other varieties.

Material
Hertae0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
other varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plumage-Archer absorbed more potassium, and Herta less phosphorus than the other varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2498–2589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About a quarter of final nitrogen was absorbed after ear emergence.

Outcome
final content of nitrogene0
Value
About a quartere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About a quarter of the final content of nitrogen, and a third of the phosphorus, was absorbed after ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2590–2703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A third of phosphorus was absorbed after ear emergence.

Outcome
phosphoruse0
Value
a thirde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a third of the phosphorus, was absorbed after ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2644–2703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium content was nearly maximal at ear emergence and later decreased.

Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the potassium content was nearly maximal at ear emergence and later decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2709–2787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear photosynthesis contributed 26 per cent of grain dry matter, including 10 per cent from awns.

Outcome
dry matter in the grain at harveste0
Value
26 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“26 per cent. of the dry matter in the grain at harvest originated from photosynthesis in the ears, including 10 per cent, from the awns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2853–2988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag-leaf lamina, sheath and peduncle supplied 59 per cent of grain dry matter, and lower shoots supplied 15 per cent.

Outcome
photosynthesis in the flag-leaf lamina and sheath and pedunclee0
Value
59 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“59 per cent, came from photosynthesis in the flag-leaf lamina and sheath and peduncle, and 15 per cent, from parts of the shoot below the flag leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2990–3138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

14 papers: 3 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.