Paper · 2004 · Acta Horticulturae

RESPONSE OF MANGO VARIETIES TO PACHLOBUTRAZOL

C.J. Rossetto; N. Bortoletto

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The registration of Pachlobutrazol (PBZ) for use in Brazil in 1998, brought a new hope for the off season mango production in the State of Sao Paulo. Four mango varieties were tried for harvest anticipation: Haden 2H, Van Dyke, Tommy Atkins and Espada Vermelha. Haden 2H showed no significant response and Espada Vermelha was very responsive to PBZ. In the first year two treatments were tried: PBZ in the soil, followed by Ethephon spray after 60 days, plus spray of Potassium Nitrate 90 days after PBZ. The second treatment was PBZ in the soil, plus the Potassium Nitrate spray after 90 days. Ethephon boosted the PBZ effect in Tommy Atkins and Espada Vermelha. The complete treatment (PBZ + Ethephon + Potassium Nitrate) was repeated in the following year, in two times of applications, with a lap of 30 days. The anticipation of harvest time was feasible. Espada Vermelha was very responsive to PBZ, but its small fruit size is not favorable for harvest anticipation with PBZ. None of the four varieties tried was ideal for off season production with PBZ in Sao Paulo State.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango variety Haden 2H showed no significant response to PBZ.

Material
Haden 2He0
Treatment
PBZe0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no significant responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Haden 2H showed no significant response and Espada Vermelha was very responsive to PBZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango variety Espada Vermelha was very responsive to PBZ.

Material
Espada Vermelhae0
Treatment
PBZe0
Outcome
responsivee0
Direction
very responsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Haden 2H showed no significant response and Espada Vermelha was very responsive to PBZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon boosted the PBZ effect in Tommy Atkins mango.

Material
Tommy Atkinse0
Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
PBZ effecte0
Direction
boostede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon boosted the PBZ effect in Tommy Atkins and Espada Vermelha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon boosted the PBZ effect in Espada Vermelha mango.

Material
Espada Vermelhae0
Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
PBZ effecte0
Direction
boostede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon boosted the PBZ effect in Tommy Atkins and Espada Vermelha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With the complete PBZ, ethephon and potassium nitrate treatment, anticipation of harvest time was feasible.

Treatment
complete treatment (PBZ + Ethephon + Potassium Nitrate)e0
Outcome
anticipation of harvest timee0
Direction
feasiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The complete treatment (PBZ + Ethephon + Potassium Nitrate) was repeated in the following year, in two times of applications, with a lap of 30 days. The anticipation of harvest time was feasible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Espada Vermelha, although very responsive to PBZ, has small fruit size that is not favorable for harvest anticipation with PBZ.

Material
Espada Vermelhae0
Outcome
small fruit size is not favorable for harvest anticipation with PBZe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Espada Vermelha was very responsive to PBZ, but its small fruit size is not favorable for harvest anticipation with PBZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

None of the four mango varieties tried was ideal for off-season production with PBZ in Sao Paulo State.

Outcome
ideal for off season productione0
Setting
Sao Paulo Statee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the four varieties tried was ideal for off season production with PBZ in Sao Paulo State”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: metabolites · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

potassium nitrate · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.