Paper · 2000 · HortScience

598 Response of Apple Rootstocks to Soil Compaction

David C. Ferree

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Container-grown apple trees on a range of rootstocks were exposed to different levels of soil compaction created by changing soil bulk density. In 1998, with soil bulk densities of 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, there was no interaction of rootstock and soil compaction for shoot growth of `Melrose' trees on 7 rootstocks. However, in 1999, with soil bulk densities of 1.0 and 1.5, a significant interaction on shoot growth did occur with six rootstocks. Shoot length of trees on M.9, M.7, and G.30 were less influenced than G.16, M.26 and MM.106. A bulk density of 1. 5 caused a decrease in dry weight of shoots, leaves, and roots of trees on all rootstocks. Compacted soil resulted in a decrease in leaf concentration of K and B and an increase in Mg and Mn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1998 trial found no shoot-growth interaction.

Taxon
treese0
Outcome
no interaction of rootstock and soil compaction for shoot growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“there was no interaction of rootstock and soil compaction for shoot growth of `Melrose' trees on 7 rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1999 trial found a significant interaction.

Taxon
rootstockse0
Outcome
interaction on shoot growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“a significant interaction on shoot growth did occur with six rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–441 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three rootstocks were less influenced than three others.

Taxon
treese0
Material
M.9, M.7, and G.30e0
Outcome
Shoot lengthe0
Direction
less influencede0
Comparator
G.16, M.26 and MM.106e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length of trees on M.9, M.7, and G.30 were less influenced than G.16, M.26 and MM.106.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High bulk density decreased shoot, leaf, and root dry weight.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
bulk density of 1. 5e0
Outcome
dry weight of shoots, leaves, and rootse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A bulk density of 1. 5 caused a decrease in dry weight of shoots, leaves, and roots of trees on all rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction decreased leaf K and B.

Treatment
Compacted soile0
Outcome
leaf concentration of K and Be0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Compacted soil resulted in a decrease in leaf concentration of K and B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–718 · show in text ↑