Paper · 2016 · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management

Phyllochron Interval and Yield Response to Planting Date and Fertility in Wheat

Joseph Oakes; Ronnie Heiniger; Carl Crozier; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Selecting the proper planting date is crucial in managing early leaf and tiller development while managing temperature. There is an ideal planting date each year that will vary based on weather conditions. Starter fertilizer may be necessary in cold, wet years to stimulate tiller growth. Early growth and fall tiller production are key to high yields. An understanding of early leaf and tiller growth in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and its impact on yield is an important concept for managing winter wheat. Field trials consisting of two planting dates (November and December) and three starter fertilizer treatments (urea ammonium nitrate, ammonium phosphate, Nachurs 9–18–9 liquid fertilizer) were conducted at four locations in North Carolina over a 2‐year period. The earlier planting dates resulted in the highest yield in 2013 to 2014, while the later planting date resulted in the highest yield in 2012 to 2013. Higher yield at the later planting dates in 2012 to 2013 was due to extremely cold weather and less than ideal growing conditions in November that increased the initial phyllochron interval (PI) of the early‐planted wheat. In contrast, ideal growing conditions in December coupled with warm winter weather resulted in a shorter average PI for wheat planted in December than for wheat planted in November. Despite a similar pattern with shorter initial PI at the later plantings in 2013 to 2014, the winter was not as warm and growing degree‐days (GDD) were not accumulated as rapidly as in the previous year, which limited the time that the later planting date had to develop leaves. A response to starter fertilizer was observed at one location in 2013 to 2014, resulting in a shorter PI and higher tiller counts with urea ammonium nitrate and 9–18–9 compared with the control. This resulted in an increased yield, and was largely due to abundant rainfall. This study indicates that planting date and starter fertilizer can influence the length of the initial PI and, depending on subsequent weather, can influence wheat yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

earlier planting dates gave the highest wheat yield in 2013 to 2014.

Treatment
earlier planting datese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2013 to 2014e0
Comparator
later planting datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The earlier planting dates resulted in the highest yield in 2013 to 2014, while the later planting date resulted in the highest yield in 2012 to 2013.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–932 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

later planting date gave the highest wheat yield in 2012 to 2013.

Treatment
later planting datee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2012 to 2013e0
Comparator
earlier planting datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The earlier planting dates resulted in the highest yield in 2013 to 2014, while the later planting date resulted in the highest yield in 2012 to 2013.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–932 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold November conditions increased initial PI in early planted wheat.

Outcome
initial phyllochron interval (PI)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
extremely cold weather and less than ideal growing conditionse0
Setting
Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extremely cold weather and less than ideal growing conditions in November that increased the initial phyllochron interval (PI) of the early‐planted wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

December planted wheat had a shorter average PI than November planted wheat.

Treatment
planted in Decembere0
Outcome
average PIe0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
planted in Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ideal growing conditions in December coupled with warm winter weather resulted in a shorter average PI for wheat planted in December than for wheat planted in November.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later planting also had shorter initial PI in 2013 to 2014.

Treatment
later plantingse0
Outcome
initial PIe0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
2013 to 2014e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite a similar pattern with shorter initial PI at the later plantings in 2013 to 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer accumulated growing degree days limited leaf development time for late planting.

Outcome
time that the later planting date had to develop leavese0
Direction
limitede0
Qualifier
growing degree‐days (GDD) were not accumulated as rapidlye0
Setting
wintere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the winter was not as warm and growing degree‐days (GDD) were not accumulated as rapidly as in the previous year, which limited the time that the later planting date had to develop leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1616 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

urea ammonium nitrate gave shorter PI than control.

Treatment
urea ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
PIe0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
one location in 2013 to 2014e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A response to starter fertilizer was observed at one location in 2013 to 2014, resulting in a shorter PI and higher tiller counts with urea ammonium nitrate and 9–18–9 compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1811 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

9–18–9 gave shorter PI than control.

Treatment
9–18–9e0
Outcome
PIe0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
one location in 2013 to 2014e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A response to starter fertilizer was observed at one location in 2013 to 2014, resulting in a shorter PI and higher tiller counts with urea ammonium nitrate and 9–18–9 compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1811 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

urea ammonium nitrate gave higher tiller counts than control.

Treatment
urea ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
tiller countse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
one location in 2013 to 2014e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A response to starter fertilizer was observed at one location in 2013 to 2014, resulting in a shorter PI and higher tiller counts with urea ammonium nitrate and 9–18–9 compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1811 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

9–18–9 gave higher tiller counts than control.

Treatment
9–18–9e0
Outcome
tiller countse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
one location in 2013 to 2014e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A response to starter fertilizer was observed at one location in 2013 to 2014, resulting in a shorter PI and higher tiller counts with urea ammonium nitrate and 9–18–9 compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1811 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer response increased yield, largely due to abundant rainfall.

Treatment
starter fertilizere1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
abundant rainfalle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This resulted in an increased yield, and was largely due to abundant rainfall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1890 · show in text ↑
e1

“A response to starter fertilizer was observed at one location in 2013 to 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1694 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–445 · show in text ↑

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.