Paper · 1994 · HortScience

648 PB 416 MINIMAL USAGE OF CARBAMATE FUNGICIDES IN FIELD PRODUCTION OF SPINACH AND POSTHARVEST REMOVAL OR RESIDUES BY WASHING TECHNIQUES

Alfredo R. Gonzalez; James C. Carrel; Dennis Motes

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to test alternative production practices that lessen the use of carbamate fungicides in the field and post-harvest washing techniques that help to reduce carbamate residues in canned spinach. Five spinach genotypes showed a high degree of resistance to white rust, the predominant field disease. The fungicide Ridomil used alone or combined with copper or Maneb provided the best control in susceptible cultivars. Maneb alone or combined with copper controlled white rust but not as efficiently as Ridomil. The most efficient washing methods to remove Maneb residues were washing with a detergent solution plus water or ozonated water or a triple wash with detergent, water and ozonated water. The lowest residue levels of ethylenethiourea (ETU), a carcinogenic carbamate derivative, detected in the washing treatments was in the range of 0.15 to 0.45 ppm. ETU in the non-washed controls fluctuated from 0.85 to 2.31 ppm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five spinach genotypes had high resistance to white rust.

Material
Five spinach genotypese0
Interactor
white ruste0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to white ruste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five spinach genotypes showed a high degree of resistance to white rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridomil alone or with copper or Maneb provided the best white-rust control in susceptible cultivars.

Material
susceptible cultivarse0
Treatment
Ridomil used alone or combined with copper or Manebe0
Interactor
white ruste1pathogen
Outcome
best controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide Ridomil used alone or combined with copper or Maneb provided the best control in susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“resistance to white rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–285 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPINACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maneb alone or with copper controlled white rust less efficiently than Ridomil.

Treatment
Maneb alone or combined with coppere0
Interactor
white ruste0pathogen
Outcome
white ruste0
Direction
not as efficientlye0
Comparator
Ridomile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maneb alone or combined with copper controlled white rust but not as efficiently as Ridomil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPINACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detergent plus water, ozonated water, or a triple wash were the most efficient at removing Maneb residues.

Treatment
washing with a detergent solution plus water or ozonated water or a triple wash with detergent, water and ozonated watere0
Outcome
Maneb residuese0
Direction
most efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most efficient washing methods to remove Maneb residues were washing with a detergent solution plus water or ozonated water or a triple wash with detergent, water and ozonated water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPINACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowest ETU residue levels after washing were 0.15 to 0.45 ppm.

Treatment
washing treatmentse0
Outcome
residue levels of ethylenethiourea (ETU)e0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.15 to 0.45 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest residue levels of ethylenethiourea (ETU), a carcinogenic carbamate derivative, detected in the washing treatments was in the range of 0.15 to 0.45 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPINACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ETU residues in non-washed controls ranged from 0.85 to 2.31 ppm.

Outcome
ETUe0
Value
0.85 to 2.31 ppme0
Comparator
non-washed controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETU in the non-washed controls fluctuated from 0.85 to 2.31 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPINACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑

copper atom · disease · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

detergent · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.