Paper · 2017 · South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Application of Fungicides Against Postharvest Botrytis Bunch Rot of Table Grapes in the Western Cape

P.J. de Kock; G. Holz

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes were evaluated in six trials from 1984/85 to 1991/92 in the Western Cape. The study demonstrated the ineffectiveness of dicarboximide applications during bloom to early pea size in well managed vineyards. Dicarboximides were most effective when applied from bunch closure to ripening. lprodioue/sulphur treatments at veraison and before harvest reduced Botrytis bunch rot, but they were ineffective in inhibiting infection during storage. Control was only achieved when grapes were exposed to S02 during storage. Although bunch dip treatments reduced infection in the vineyard, this control was not commercially acceptable. Therefore no real advantage was found when bunches were dipped in fungicide at veraison to ensure better coverage. The fact that berries became infected primarily during harvest, package operations and storage, emphasised the necessity for reducing B. cinerea inoculum on harvested grapes. It is suggested that the results of this investigation may lay the foundation for incorporating biological control in Botrytis bunch rot control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicarboximide applications from bloom to early pea size were ineffective against Botrytis bunch rot of table grapes in well-managed vineyards.

Taxon
table grapese2
Treatment
dicarboximide applications during bloom to early pea sizee1
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytise2pathogen
Outcome
control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rote2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study demonstrated the ineffectiveness of dicarboximide applications during bloom to early pea size in well managed vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicarboximides were most effective against Botrytis bunch rot of table grapes when applied from bunch closure to ripening.

Taxon
table grapese2
Treatment
Dicarboximidese1
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytise2pathogen
Outcome
control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rote2
Qualifier
applied from bunch closure to ripeninge1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Dicarboximides were most effective when applied from bunch closure to ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lprodione/sulphur treatments at veraison and before harvest reduced Botrytis bunch rot of table grapes.

Taxon
table grapese2
Treatment
lprodioue/sulphur treatments at veraison and before harveste1
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytise1pathogen
Outcome
Botrytis bunch rote1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“lprodioue/sulphur treatments at veraison and before harvest reduced Botrytis bunch rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–458 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lprodione/sulphur treatments at veraison and before harvest were ineffective in inhibiting infection during storage.

Taxon
table grapese2
Treatment
lprodioue/sulphur treatments at veraison and before harveste1
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytise1pathogen
Outcome
infection during storagee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“lprodioue/sulphur treatments at veraison and before harvest reduced Botrytis bunch rot, but they were ineffective in inhibiting infection during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–524 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of Botrytis bunch rot was achieved on grapes only when they were exposed to SO2 during storage.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
exposed to S02 during storagee1
Outcome
Controle1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Control was only achieved when grapes were exposed to S02 during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunch dip treatments reduced infection of table grapes in the vineyard, but this control was not commercially acceptable.

Taxon
table grapese2
Treatment
bunch dip treatmentse1
Outcome
infection in the vineyarde1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
not commercially acceptablee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Although bunch dip treatments reduced infection in the vineyard, this control was not commercially acceptable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–709 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping table grape bunches in fungicide at veraison gave no real advantage to ensure better coverage.

Taxon
table grapese2
Treatment
bunches were dipped in fungicide at veraisone1
Outcome
advantagee1
Qualifier
to ensure better coveragee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“no real advantage was found when bunches were dipped in fungicide at veraison to ensure better coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–824 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Table grape berries became infected primarily during harvest, package operations and storage.

Taxon
table grapese2
Organ / stage
berriese1
Outcome
became infectede1
Qualifier
primarilye1
Setting
harvest, package operations and storagee1

Verbatim

e1

“The fact that berries became infected primarily during harvest, package operations and storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–920 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicide programmes for the control of postharvest Botrytis bunch rot on table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing B. cinerea inoculum on harvested grapes is necessary.

Taxon
grapese1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
reducing B. cinerea inoculum on harvested grapese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“emphasised the necessity for reducing B. cinerea inoculum on harvested grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–999 · show in text ↑

dicarboximide · Botrytis · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · control · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.