Paper · 2016 · Korean Journal of Crop Science

Growth and Yield Under Low Solar Radiation During the Reproductive Growth Stages of Rice Plants

DONGBANGAGRO Co.(Limited), Seoul, Republic of KOREA; Seonghak Lee; Eunho Son; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

벼의 일조부족에 대한 생리적 반응을 조사하기 위하여 유수형성기와 수잉기에 각각 40%, 70% 차광처리를 출수직전까지 처리한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 유수형성기와 수잉기에 차광처리후 출수기 간장은 차광처리가 유의하게 길어졌고, 수장은 유의하게 감소하였다. 2. 출수 후 건물생산량은 무처리에 비하여 차광 처리구에서 현저하게 감소하였으며 유수형성기 처리가 수잉기 처리에 비하여 유의한 감소를 보였고, 40% 차광처리보다 70% 차광처리에서 현저하게 감소하였다. 3. 차광처리구의 출수 후 잎의 엽색도와 질소 함량은 무처리에 비하여 유수형성기와 수잉기 처리 모두 차광 처리 정도가 높을수록 높아졌다. 4. 출수 후 20일에 벼 식물체 도복지수는 차광처리가 현저히 높아졌으며, 유수형성기 처리구가 수잉기 처리보다 유의하게 높아졌다. 5. 차광처리는 수량구성요소 중에서 이삭수와 이삭당 영화수를 감소시켰으며, 등숙률과 천립중을 감소시킴으로서 수량을 유의하게 감소시켰다. 6. 차광처리는 쌀의 단백질 함량을 높였으며 아밀로스 함량은 감소폭이 크지 않았다. Recently, rice growth and production have been influenced by climatic change worldwide. In particular, under low solar radiation and cloudy weather, rice plants show abnormal physiological responses. In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared. After shading treatments, culm lengths were significnatly longer than that in natural condition plots, and panicle lengths were shorter in the 40% and 70% shading treatment plots compared to control plots. After heading, the production of dry matter treated at the PI stage was significantly lower than that at the booting stage. SPAD values of the leaf color and N concentration of leaves treated with shading were greater than those under natural conditions. In the shading treatment, the lodging index at 20 days after heading was significantly higher than that in natural condition. For yield components, number of panicles, spikelet number per panicle, and ripened grain ratio significantly decreased with shading treatment; thus, rice yield decreased significantly. For rice quality, the protein content of the head rice treated with shading was significantly higher than that in the control plot, but the amylose content of rice treated with shading was signifiantly lower than that in rice in control plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded rice had significantly longer culms than plants under natural conditions.

Material
Samgwangbyeoe1
Treatment
shading treatmentse0
Outcome
culm lengthse0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
natural condition plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After shading treatments, culm lengths were significnatly longer than that in natural condition plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1062 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading shortened rice panicles relative to control plots.

Treatment
40% and 70% shading treatment plotse0
Outcome
panicle lengthse0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“panicle lengths were shorter in the 40% and 70% shading treatment plots compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-heading rice dry matter production was significantly lower after primordium initiation shading than after booting-stage shading.

Treatment
PI stagee0
Outcome
production of dry mattere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
booting stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After heading, the production of dry matter treated at the PI stage was significantly lower than that at the booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded rice leaves had greater SPAD leaf color values than leaves in natural conditions.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
SPAD values of the leaf colore0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
natural conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD values of the leaf color and N concentration of leaves treated with shading were greater than those under natural conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded rice leaves had greater nitrogen concentration than leaves in natural conditions.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
N concentration of leavese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
natural conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD values of the leaf color and N concentration of leaves treated with shading were greater than those under natural conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly increased rice lodging index 20 days after heading.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
lodging indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 20 days after headinge0
Comparator
natural conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the shading treatment, the lodging index at 20 days after heading was significantly higher than that in natural condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1546 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly reduced the number of rice panicles.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
number of paniclese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of panicles, spikelet number per panicle, and ripened grain ratio significantly decreased with shading treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly reduced spikelets per rice panicle.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
spikelet number per paniclee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of panicles, spikelet number per panicle, and ripened grain ratio significantly decreased with shading treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly reduced the rice ripened grain ratio.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
ripened grain ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of panicles, spikelet number per panicle, and ripened grain ratio significantly decreased with shading treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this experiment, plants of the rice cultivar Samgwangbyeo grown 40% and 70% shading and natural conditions at the primordium initiation stage (PI) for 30 days and the booting stage for 10 days up to heading were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly reduced rice yield.

Treatment
shading treatmente0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of panicles, spikelet number per panicle, and ripened grain ratio significantly decreased with shading treatment; thus, rice yield decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly increased protein content of head rice relative to controls.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
protein content of the head ricee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the protein content of the head rice treated with shading was significantly higher than that in the control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly reduced rice amylose content relative to controls.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
amylose content of ricee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amylose content of rice treated with shading was signifiantly lower than that in rice in control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1975 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

36 papers: 10 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

shade · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 15 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.