Abstract
Nutrient supply through organic sources usually requires fortification for timely and optimum release of plant nutrients to achieve optimum crop performance. A pot experiment was conducted in a screen house to determine the optimum rate of cassava peel compost (CPC) fortification that supports optimum Amaranthus (Amaranthus cruentus L.) plant nutrient contents and residual soil nutrient contents. A compost of cassava peel and poultry manure was applied at 2.5; 5.0 and 7.5 t ha−1each complemented with either 25 or 50 kg nitrogen (N), using nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) 20-10-10 at 2 weeks before sowing Amaranthus. An unfertilized treatment served as control. Seeds were sown in plastic containers with a surface diameter of 24 cm filled with 5 kg soil, with a drain underneath. Seedlings were thinned to 4 plants/pot 2 weeks after planting. Plants were harvested at 5 weeks by ratooning and plant re-growth also harvested after 5 weeks. Soil pH was lower with high rates of 5.0 and 7.5 t ha−1 CPC while the organic matter content was increased with increased CPC rate. Soil N was reduced but reflected in increased plant shoot and root N, with compost application. Soil P was generally increased but was not reflected in plant contents. Soil K contents were reduced and were reflected in increased plant contents. Application of 2.5 t ha−1 CPC, fortified with either 25 or 50 kg N ha−1 gave the optimum Amaranthus shoot nutrient contents with optimum residual soil nutrient contents.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Higher compost rates lowered soil pH.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Soil pH was lower with high rates of 5.0 and 7.5 t ha−1 CPC while the organic matter content was increased with increased CPC rate.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing compost rate increased soil organic matter content.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Soil pH was lower with high rates of 5.0 and 7.5 t ha−1 CPC while the organic matter content was increased with increased CPC rate.”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost application reduced soil nitrogen.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Soil N was reduced but reflected in increased plant shoot and root N, with compost application.”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost application increased Amaranthus shoot and root nitrogen.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus
Amaranthust0 - Treatment
- compost applicatione0
- Outcome
- plant shoot and root Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Soil N was reduced but reflected in increased plant shoot and root N, with compost application.”
t0“Amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil phosphorus generally increased.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Soil P was generally increased but was not reflected in plant contents.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increased soil phosphorus was not reflected in plant phosphorus content.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus
Amaranthust0 - Outcome
- plant contentse0
- Qualifier
- not reflectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Soil P was generally increased but was not reflected in plant contents.”
t0“Amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil potassium content decreased.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Soil K contents were reduced and were reflected in increased plant contents.”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant potassium content increased.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus
Amaranthust0 - Outcome
- plant contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Soil K contents were reduced and were reflected in increased plant contents.”
t0“Amaranthus”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost at 2.5 t ha−1 fortified with 25 kg N ha−1 gave optimal shoot nutrient and residual soil nutrient contents.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus
Amaranthuse0 - Treatment
- 2.5 t ha−1 CPC, fortified with either 25 or 50 kg N ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Amaranthus shoot nutrient contentse0
- Direction
- optimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Application of 2.5 t ha−1 CPC, fortified with either 25 or 50 kg N ha−1 gave the optimum Amaranthus shoot nutrient contents with optimum residual soil nutrient contents.”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · nutrient: content · AmaranthusPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
fertilization · nutrient: content · AmaranthusPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.