Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2007-08 on medium deep black soil at Cotton Improvement Project, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri to find out the best profitable Bt cotton based intercropping system under rainfed condition. Experimental results revealed that treatment Bt cotton+soybean (1 : 1) recorded significantly more seed cotton yield (17.83 q/ha) closely followed by Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1) (16.93 q/ha) as compared to sole Bt cotton (15.27 q/ha). All the intercropping treatments were at par with each other in respect of seed cotton yield. The highest seed cotton equivalent yield (21.37 q/ha), net returns (Rs. 23150/ ha) and B : C ratio (1 : 1.89) over sole Bt cotton (15.25 q/ha, Rs. 10075/ha and 1 : 1.40, respectively) were also acrrued with the treatment Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1). Nitrogen status in soil increased with all legume intercropping treatments compared to sole Bt cotton.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Bt cotton+soybean (1:1) yielded significantly more seed cotton (17.83 q/ha) than sole Bt cotton.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Material
- Bt cottone1
- Treatment
- Bt cotton+soybean (1 : 1)e1
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 17.83 q/hae1
- Comparator
- sole Bt cottone2
- Setting
- field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Bt cotton+soybean (1 : 1) recorded significantly more seed cotton yield (17.83 q/ha)”
e2“as compared to sole Bt cotton (15.27 q/ha)”
e0“A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2007-08”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt cotton+greengram (1:1) gave 16.93 q/ha seed cotton, closely following the soybean intercrop and above sole Bt cotton (15.27 q/ha).
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume3
- Material
- Bt cottone3
- Treatment
- Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1)e3
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde1
- Value
- 16.93 q/hae3
- Comparator
- sole Bt cottone2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“closely followed by Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1) (16.93 q/ha)”
e2“as compared to sole Bt cotton (15.27 q/ha)”
e1“Bt cotton+soybean (1 : 1) recorded significantly more seed cotton yield (17.83 q/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
All intercropping treatments had seed cotton yields at par with each other.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume4
- Treatment
- intercropping treatmentse4
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede4
- Comparator
- with each othere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“All the intercropping treatments were at par with each other in respect of seed cotton yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt cotton+greengram (1:1) had the highest seed cotton equivalent yield (21.37 q/ha), above sole Bt cotton (15.25 q/ha).
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume5
- Treatment
- Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1)e7
- Outcome
- seed cotton equivalent yielde5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 21.37 q/hae5
- Qualifier
- 15.25 q/hae6
- Comparator
- sole Bt cottone6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The highest seed cotton equivalent yield (21.37 q/ha)”
e6“over sole Bt cotton (15.25 q/ha, Rs. 10075/ha and 1 : 1.40”
e7“acrrued with the treatment Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt cotton+greengram (1:1) had higher net returns (Rs. 23150/ha) than sole Bt cotton (Rs. 10075/ha).
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume7
- Treatment
- Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1)e7
- Outcome
- net returnse3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- Rs. 23150/ hae3
- Qualifier
- Rs. 10075/hae6
- Comparator
- sole Bt cottone6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“net returns (Rs. 23150/ ha) and B : C ratio (1 : 1.89)”
e6“over sole Bt cotton (15.25 q/ha, Rs. 10075/ha and 1 : 1.40”
e7“acrrued with the treatment Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt cotton+greengram (1:1) had a higher B:C ratio (1:1.89) than sole Bt cotton (1:1.40).
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume7
- Treatment
- Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1)e7
- Outcome
- B : C ratioe3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 1 : 1.89e3
- Qualifier
- 1 : 1.40e6
- Comparator
- sole Bt cottone6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“net returns (Rs. 23150/ ha) and B : C ratio (1 : 1.89)”
e6“over sole Bt cotton (15.25 q/ha, Rs. 10075/ha and 1 : 1.40”
e7“acrrued with the treatment Bt cotton+greengram (1 : 1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Legume intercropping increased soil nitrogen status compared with sole Bt cotton.
Verbatim
e4“Nitrogen status in soil increased with all legume intercropping treatments compared to sole Bt cotton”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →intercropping · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →transgenic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.