Paper · 2016 · Universal Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of Zinc on Some Grain Quality Parameters in Bread and Durum Wheat Cultivars

İlknur Akgun; Ruziye Karaman; Figen Eraslan; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research was conducted in Isparta, Turkey ecological condition to investigate the effects of different zinc application doses on some quality parameters of bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars. The experiment was set up with three replications according to the randomized complete block design with a split-plot design. The cultivars took place in the main plots whereas the zinc application doses (0, 9, 18, 27 and 36 kg ha-1 Zn) were in the sub-plots. Phosphorus and nitrogen fertilizers providing 40 kg ha-1 of P2O5 and 80 kg ha-1 of N were applied to the plots. According to the result of variance analysis, different zinc application in wheat cultivars had significant effect on the grain quality parameters. But zinc fertilization had no effect on test weight. The effect of Zn treatment found statistically important on sedimentation and wet gluten content of flour, Zn, P and crude protein contents of bran and flour. In all cultivars, Zn application increased sedimentation, wet gluten content, protein, Zn content and P content in bran. However, the Zn application decreased the amount of P in flour. Also, protein, Zn and P contents were higher in the bran than in the flour. In the research results, it was found that Zn application had a positive effect on quality parameters, but high Zn doses affected both grain yield and quality parameters negatively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application increased sedimentation and wet gluten content of flour, a statistically significant effect.

Material
bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivarse0
Treatment
Zn applicatione1
Outcome
sedimentation, wet gluten contente1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Isparta, Turkeye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all cultivars, Zn application increased sedimentation, wet gluten content, protein, Zn content and P content in bran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1094 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of Zn treatment found statistically important on sedimentation and wet gluten content of flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–921 · show in text ↑
e3

“This research was conducted in Isparta, Turkey ecological condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application increased protein, Zn content and P content in bran.

Material
bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivarse0
Organ / stage
brane1
Treatment
Zn applicatione1
Outcome
protein, Zn content and P content in brane1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Isparta, Turkeye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all cultivars, Zn application increased sedimentation, wet gluten content, protein, Zn content and P content in bran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1094 · show in text ↑
e3

“This research was conducted in Isparta, Turkey ecological condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application decreased the amount of P in flour.

Treatment
Zn applicatione4
Outcome
amount of P in floure4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–241 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, the Zn application decreased the amount of P in flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein, Zn and P contents were higher in the bran than in the flour.

Organ / stage
brane5
Outcome
protein, Zn and P contentse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
the floure5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–241 · show in text ↑
e5

“Also, protein, Zn and P contents were higher in the bran than in the flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization had no effect on test weight.

Treatment
zinc fertilizatione6
Outcome
test weighte6
Direction
no effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–241 · show in text ↑
e6

“But zinc fertilization had no effect on test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High Zn doses affected grain yield and quality parameters negatively.

Treatment
high Zn dosese7
Outcome
grain yield and quality parameterse7
Direction
negativelye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–241 · show in text ↑
e7

“high Zn doses affected both grain yield and quality parameters negatively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application had a positive effect on quality parameters.

Treatment
Zn applicatione7
Outcome
quality parameterse7
Direction
positive effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bread (Gün-91, Altay-2000) and durum (Kızıltan-91, Kunduru-1149) wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–241 · show in text ↑
e7

“it was found that Zn application had a positive effect on quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1337 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.