Paper · 2016 · Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding

Uni- and multivariate approaches to evaluating the susceptibility of wheat hybrids to Fusarium head blight

Maria SURMA; Tadeusz ADAMSKI; Halina WIŚNIEWSKA; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a disease of small grain cereals caused by Fusarium species. The pathogens affect spikes and kernels, resulting in reductions of yield and its quality. The present study was conducted to evaluate variation in the FHB resistance of wheat F2 hybrids derived from 16 crosses between winter wheat cultivars of various origin and with different susceptibility to FHB. Plants were inoculated with a conidial suspension consisting of a mixture of F. culmorum, F. graminearum and F. avenaceum isolates. After harvest 1000-kernel weight, number of kernels per spike and kernel weight per spike were evaluated in inoculated and control plants. Disease symptoms were observed on kernels of infected plants and the percentage of Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK) was calculated. The data were statistically evaluated using uni- and multivariate analyses. A significant influence of genotype and treatment on all observed characteristics was detected. Contrasts between control and inoculated plants showed that inoculation lowered the mean values of all the yield-related traits significantly (in the statistical sense). Results of uni- and multivariate analyses enabled us to find three cross combinations which exhibited a low FDK percentage and simultaneously a relatively low reduction of 1000-kernel weight after inoculation. They may be promising for breeding wheat with improved resistance to FHB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Fusarium species significantly lowered the mean values of all yield-related traits in wheat hybrids compared with control plants.

Treatment
inoculatione1
Interactor
F. culmorum, F. graminearum and F. avenaceumFusarium culmorumFusarium graminearumFusarium avenaceume2pathogen
Outcome
yield-related traitse1
Direction
lowerede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat F2 hybrids derived from 16 crosses between winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Contrasts between control and inoculated plants showed that inoculation lowered the mean values of all the yield-related traits significantly (in the statistical sense)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1134 · show in text ↑
e2

“a conidial suspension consisting of a mixture of F. culmorum, F. graminearum and F. avenaceum isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–523 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three cross combinations had a low Fusarium-damaged kernel percentage and a relatively low reduction of 1000-kernel weight after inoculation.

Material
three cross combinationse1
Outcome
FDK percentagee1
Direction
lowe1
Qualifier
relatively low reduction of 1000-kernel weight after inoculatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat F2 hybrids derived from 16 crosses between winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results of uni- and multivariate analyses enabled us to find three cross combinations which exhibited a low FDK percentage and simultaneously a relatively low reduction of 1000-kernel weight after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1344 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and treatment significantly influenced all observed characteristics of the wheat hybrids.

Material
genotypee3
Treatment
treatmente3
Outcome
observed characteristicse3
Direction
influencee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat F2 hybrids derived from 16 crosses between winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–332 · show in text ↑
e3

“A significant influence of genotype and treatment on all observed characteristics was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–964 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three cross combinations may be promising for breeding wheat with improved resistance to FHB.

Outcome
improved resistance to FHBe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“They may be promising for breeding wheat with improved resistance to FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1418 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Fusarium culmorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 14 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.