Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Cuticular Wax Accumulation Is Associated with Drought Tolerance in Wheat Near-Isogenic Lines

Jun Guo; Wen Xu; Xiaocong Yu; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
102
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that wheat grain yield is seriously affected by drought stress, and leaf cuticular wax is reportedly associated with drought tolerance. However, most studies have focused on cuticular wax biosynthesis and model species. The effects of cuticular wax on wheat drought tolerance have rarely been studied. The aims of the current study were to study the effects of leaf cuticular wax on wheat grain yield under drought stress using the above-mentioned wheat NILs and to discuss the possible physiological mechanism of cuticular wax on high grain yield under drought stress. Compared to water-irrigated (WI) conditions, the cuticular wax content (CWC) in glaucous and non-glaucous NILs under drought-stress (DS) conditions both increased; mean increase values were 151.1 and 114.4%, respectively, which was corroborated by scanning electronic microscopy images of large wax particles loaded on the surfaces of flag leaves. The average yield of glaucous NILs was higher than that of non-glaucous NILs under DS conditions in 2014 and 2015; mean values were 7368.37 kgha -1 and 7103.51 kg -1

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, cuticular wax content in glaucous wheat NILs increased relative to water-irrigated conditions, by a mean of 151.1%.

Material
glaucouse0
Treatment
drought-stress (DS) conditionse0
Outcome
cuticular wax content (CWC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
151.1e0
Comparator
water-irrigated (WI) conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Near-Isogenic Lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to water-irrigated (WI) conditions, the cuticular wax content (CWC) in glaucous and non-glaucous NILs under drought-stress (DS) conditions both increased; mean increase values were 151.1 and 114.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, cuticular wax content in non-glaucous wheat NILs increased relative to water-irrigated conditions, by a mean of 114.4%.

Material
non-glaucous NILse0
Treatment
drought-stress (DS) conditionse0
Outcome
cuticular wax content (CWC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
114.4%e0
Comparator
water-irrigated (WI) conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Near-Isogenic Lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to water-irrigated (WI) conditions, the cuticular wax content (CWC) in glaucous and non-glaucous NILs under drought-stress (DS) conditions both increased; mean increase values were 151.1 and 114.4%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–818 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scanning electron microscopy images showed large wax particles on the surfaces of flag leaves, corroborating the increased wax content under drought.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Outcome
large wax particles loaded on the surfacese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Near-Isogenic Lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“scanning electronic microscopy images of large wax particles loaded on the surfaces of flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress in 2014 and 2015, average yield of glaucous wheat NILs was higher than that of non-glaucous NILs (mean 7368.37 vs 7103.51 kg per ha).

Material
glaucous NILse0
Treatment
DS conditionse0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7368.37 kgha -1 and 7103.51 kg -1e0
Comparator
non-glaucous NILse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Near-Isogenic Lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average yield of glaucous NILs was higher than that of non-glaucous NILs under DS conditions in 2014 and 2015; mean values were 7368.37 kgha -1 and 7103.51 kg -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1111 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.