Paper · 2016 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION

Effect of different newer pesticides on aphid population of summer okra

Y.T. JADHAV; S.R. MANE; D.S. SHINDE

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The studies on bio-efficacy of aphid population showed quite promising results and from the pooled data at first spray, the results revealed that all the treatments proved their superiority over untreated control showing imidacloprid 70WG as the most effective treatment followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG, fipronil 5SC and diafenthiuron 50WP. The second spray results showed that thiamethoxam 25WG, imidacloprid 70WG and fipronil 5SC proved to be the best treatments with maximum reduction of population and were found at par with each other.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At first spray, all pesticide treatments outperformed untreated control for aphid reduction.

Taxon
summer okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treatments proved their superiority over untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–212 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 70WG was most effective at first spray.

Taxon
summer okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
imidacloprid 70WGe0
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
thiamethoxam 25 WGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid 70WG as the most effective treatment followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG, fipronil 5SC and diafenthiuron 50WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 25WG was among the best second-spray treatments for aphid reduction.

Taxon
summer okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
thiamethoxam 25WGe0
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
maximum reductione0
Comparator
imidacloprid 70WG and fipronil 5SCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 25WG, imidacloprid 70WG and fipronil 5SC proved to be the best treatments with maximum reduction of population and were found at par with each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 70WG was among the best second-spray treatments for aphid reduction.

Taxon
summer okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
imidacloprid 70WGe0
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
maximum reductione0
Comparator
thiamethoxam 25WGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 25WG, imidacloprid 70WG and fipronil 5SC proved to be the best treatments with maximum reduction of population and were found at par with each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 5SC was among the best second-spray treatments for aphid reduction.

Taxon
summer okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
fipronil 5SCe0
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
maximum reductione0
Comparator
thiamethoxam 25WGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 25WG, imidacloprid 70WG and fipronil 5SC proved to be the best treatments with maximum reduction of population and were found at par with each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑

fipronil · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.