Paper · 2015 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

Effects of lignite-derived humic acid on some selected soil properties, growth and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under greenhouse conditions.

Tuba Arjumend; M. Abbasi; E. Rafique

17
claims
39
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Humic acid (HA) has been reported a promising natural resource showing persistent effects on plant growth promotion, nutrient uptake and soil nutrient status. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to determine the effects of soil and foliar applied HA on the changes in selected soil properties and growth/nutrient accumulation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The experiment comprised of 05 levels of soil applied HA viz., 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg kg -1 ; 02 levels of soil+foliar applied HA i.e., 0 and 100 mg kg -1 tested on two different soils i.e. loam and silt loam. Results indicated that application of HA increased plant growth in terms of shoot length (18%), root length (29%), shoot dry weight (76%), root dry weight (100%) and chlorophyll content (96%). Response of yield and yield components displayed a significant increase in 1000-grain weight (8–16%), biological yield (18–36%), dry matter yield (15–25%) and grain yield (19–58%). The relative increase in NPK uptake in plants grown under HA was 57, 96 and 62%, respectively over the control. HA improved soil nutrient status by increasing organic matter (9%), total N (30%), available P (166%) and available K (52%), indicating a substantial increase in soil nutrient status. The improvement in soil fertility and wheat productivity in response to humic acid observed in this study is critical in the degraded and eroded soils generally exist in the State of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of the world. The quality and productivity of these degraded and eroded soils may be upgraded by including HA in our agricultural cropping pattern/system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat shoot length by 18%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of HA increased plant growth in terms of shoot length (18%), root length (29%), shoot dry weight (76%), root dry weight (100%) and chlorophyll content (96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat root length by 29%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
29%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of HA increased plant growth in terms of shoot length (18%), root length (29%), shoot dry weight (76%), root dry weight (100%) and chlorophyll content (96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat shoot dry weight by 76%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
76%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of HA increased plant growth in terms of shoot length (18%), root length (29%), shoot dry weight (76%), root dry weight (100%) and chlorophyll content (96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat root dry weight by 100%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
100%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of HA increased plant growth in terms of shoot length (18%), root length (29%), shoot dry weight (76%), root dry weight (100%) and chlorophyll content (96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat chlorophyll content by 96%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
96%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of HA increased plant growth in terms of shoot length (18%), root length (29%), shoot dry weight (76%), root dry weight (100%) and chlorophyll content (96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat 1000-grain weight by 8–16%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
1000-grain weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
8–16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant increase in 1000-grain weight (8–16%), biological yield (18–36%), dry matter yield (15–25%) and grain yield (19–58%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–947 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat biological yield by 18–36%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
18–36%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant increase in 1000-grain weight (8–16%), biological yield (18–36%), dry matter yield (15–25%) and grain yield (19–58%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–947 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat dry matter yield by 15–25%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
dry matter yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
15–25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant increase in 1000-grain weight (8–16%), biological yield (18–36%), dry matter yield (15–25%) and grain yield (19–58%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–947 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat grain yield by 19–58%.

Treatment
HAe2
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
19–58%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant increase in 1000-grain weight (8–16%), biological yield (18–36%), dry matter yield (15–25%) and grain yield (19–58%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–947 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of HA increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat N by 57 over control.

Treatment
HAe1
Outcome
NPK uptakee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
57e1
Qualifier
Ne1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative increase in NPK uptake in plants grown under HA was 57, 96 and 62%, respectively over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat P by 96 over control.

Treatment
HAe1
Outcome
NPK uptakee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
96e1
Qualifier
Pe1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative increase in NPK uptake in plants grown under HA was 57, 96 and 62%, respectively over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased wheat K by 62% over control.

Treatment
HAe1
Outcome
NPK uptakee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
62%e1
Qualifier
Ke1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–359 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative increase in NPK uptake in plants grown under HA was 57, 96 and 62%, respectively over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased soil organic matter by 9%.

Treatment
HAe0
Outcome
organic mattere0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
9%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HA improved soil nutrient status by increasing organic matter (9%), total N (30%), available P (166%) and available K (52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased soil total N by 30%.

Treatment
HAe0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HA improved soil nutrient status by increasing organic matter (9%), total N (30%), available P (166%) and available K (52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased soil available P by 166%.

Treatment
HAe0
Outcome
available Pe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
166%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HA improved soil nutrient status by increasing organic matter (9%), total N (30%), available P (166%) and available K (52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased soil available K by 52%.

Treatment
HAe0
Outcome
available Ke0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
52%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HA improved soil nutrient status by increasing organic matter (9%), total N (30%), available P (166%) and available K (52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1184 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend humic acid in cropping systems for degraded soils.

Treatment
HAe0
Outcome
quality and productivity of these degraded and eroded soils may be upgradede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality and productivity of these degraded and eroded soils may be upgraded by including HA in our agricultural cropping pattern/system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–130 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 64 positive, 11 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

other · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 100 positive, 14 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

219 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.