Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Application of Single Superphosphate with Humic Acid Improves the Growth, Yield and Phosphorus Uptake of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Calcareous Soil

Muhammad Izhar Shafi; Muhammad Adnan; Shah Fahad; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
141
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In calcareous soil, the significant portion of applied phosphorus (P) fertilizers is adsorbed on the calcite surface and becomes unavailable to plants. Addition of organic amendments with chemical fertilizers can be helpful in releasing the absorbed nutrients from these surfaces. To check out this problem, a field experiment was conducted for two years to determine the effect of P fertilizers and humic acid (HA) in enhancing P availability in soil and their ultimate effect on growth, yield and P uptake of wheat in calcareous soils. The experiment was comprised of five levels of P (0, 45, 67.5, 90 and 112.5 kg P2O5 ha−1) as a single superphosphate (SSP) and 2 levels of locally produced humic acid (with and without HA) arranged in a two factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Wheat plant height, spike length, number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain, straw and biological yield were significantly improved by the addition of HA with SSP. Very often, the performance of 67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 with HA were either similar or better than 90 or even 112.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 applied without HA. Post-harvest soil organic matter, AB-DTPA extractable and water-soluble P, plant P concentration and its uptake were also significantly improved by the addition of HA with SSP compared to sole SSP application. It was evident that P efficiency could be increased with HA addition and it has the potential to improve crop yield and plants P uptake in calcareous soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid with SSP significantly improved wheat plant height, spike length, and grains per spike.

Treatment
addition of HA with SSPe0
Outcome
plant height, spike length, number of grains per spikee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole SSP applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plant height, spike length, number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain, straw and biological yield were significantly improved by the addition of HA with SSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to sole SSP application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid with SSP significantly improved wheat 1000-grain weight and grain, straw, and biological yields.

Treatment
addition of HA with SSPe0
Outcome
1000-grain weight, grain, straw and biological yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole SSP applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plant height, spike length, number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain, straw and biological yield were significantly improved by the addition of HA with SSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to sole SSP application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 plus HA treatment often matched or exceeded 90 or 112.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 without HA.

Treatment
67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 with HAe0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
either similar or bettere0
Comparator
90 or even 112.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 applied without HAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“performance of 67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 with HA were either similar or better than 90 or even 112.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 applied without HA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HA with SSP significantly improved postharvest soil organic matter over sole SSP.

Treatment
addition of HA with SSPe0
Outcome
Post-harvest soil organic mattere0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole SSP applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-harvest soil organic matter, AB-DTPA extractable and water-soluble P, plant P concentration and its uptake were also significantly improved by the addition of HA with SSP compared to sole SSP application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HA with SSP significantly improved postharvest extractable and water-soluble soil phosphorus over sole SSP.

Treatment
addition of HA with SSPe0
Outcome
AB-DTPA extractable and water-soluble Pe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole SSP applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-harvest soil organic matter, AB-DTPA extractable and water-soluble P, plant P concentration and its uptake were also significantly improved by the addition of HA with SSP compared to sole SSP application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HA with SSP significantly improved wheat plant phosphorus concentration and uptake over sole SSP.

Treatment
addition of HA with SSPe0
Outcome
plant P concentration and its uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole SSP applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-harvest soil organic matter, AB-DTPA extractable and water-soluble P, plant P concentration and its uptake were also significantly improved by the addition of HA with SSP compared to sole SSP application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that HA addition could increase phosphorus efficiency.

Outcome
P efficiency could be increased with HA additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P efficiency could be increased with HA addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 64 positive, 11 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

219 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.