Paper · 2015 · Agronomy Journal

Yield and Nitrogen Uptake of Bowl‐Seedling Machine‐Transplanted Rice with Slow‐Release Nitrogen Fertilizer

Xuekuan Miao; Xiaoming Xing; Yanfeng Ding; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Slow‐release N fertilizer is considered an effective method of improving the N use efficiency (NUE). To investigate yield and N uptake of bowl‐seedling machine‐transplanted rice ( Oryza sativa L.) with slow‐release N fertilizer, three fertilizers treatments including slow‐release fertilizer blend (SFB), polymer‐coated urea (PCU), and sulfur‐coated urea (SCU), and two fertilizer methods including single basal application (B), and combined with tillering urea (BT) were performed from 2013 to 2014 in Jiangsu Yellow Sea Farm of China. Conventional split fertilization (CK) and zero N treatment (N0) are controls. Yield and NUE improvement was found in PCU under both fertilization methods in both years when compared with the CK. The SCU only showed a slight yield increase in 2014, while SFB increased the yields and NUEs under both fertilization methods in both years. The BT‐SFB got the highest yields as 13.6 and 13.3 Mg ha −1 , as well as increased 7.9 and 10.8% compared with CK in both years, respectively. The recovery efficiency of N was also the highest for BT‐SFB with 52.7 and 38.5% for 2013 and 2014, respectively. The results indicated that SFB can meet the rice N demand and improve the yield and NUE, and the combined application of tillering urea and SFB was better than that of single basal application with SFB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU improved yield relative to conventional fertilization in both years and methods.

Treatment
PCUe1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
improvemente1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield and NUE improvement was found in PCU under both fertilization methods in both years when compared with the CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU improved nitrogen use efficiency relative to conventional fertilization.

Treatment
PCUe1
Outcome
NUEe1
Direction
improvemente1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield and NUE improvement was found in PCU under both fertilization methods in both years when compared with the CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU slightly increased yield in 2014.

Treatment
SCUe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
2014e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“The SCU only showed a slight yield increase in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SFB increased yield under both methods in both years.

Treatment
SFBe1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“SFB increased the yields and NUEs under both fertilization methods in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SFB increased nitrogen use efficiency under both methods in both years.

Treatment
SFBe1
Outcome
NUEse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“SFB increased the yields and NUEs under both fertilization methods in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–872 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BT-SFB yielded 13.6 Mg ha −1 in 2013, 7.9% above CK.

Treatment
BT‐SFBe1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
13.6 and 13.3 Mg ha −1e1
Qualifier
7.9 and 10.8%e1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BT‐SFB got the highest yields as 13.6 and 13.3 Mg ha −1 , as well as increased 7.9 and 10.8% compared with CK in both years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BT-SFB had the highest nitrogen recovery efficiency, 52.7% in 2013 and 38.5% in 2014.

Treatment
BT‐SFBe1
Outcome
recovery efficiency of Ne1
Direction
higheste1
Value
52.7 and 38.5%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“The recovery efficiency of N was also the highest for BT‐SFB with 52.7 and 38.5% for 2013 and 2014, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1129 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined tillering urea and SFB application was better than a single basal SFB application.

Outcome
combined application of tillering urea and SFBe1
Comparator
single basal application with SFBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–196 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combined application of tillering urea and SFB was better than that of single basal application with SFB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1332 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.