Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, during the winter season of 201213 on clay loam soils, to evaluate the effect of different sowing dates and nitrogen fertilizer on forage yield and nitrogen uptake in turnip [Brassica rapa (L.)]. The crop sown on 26 September recorded sig- nificantly higher plant height, number of leaves, forage yield, and nitrogen uptake than that sown on 26 October and 11 November. Higher values of plant height and forage yield were the reflection of higher accumulation of growing degree-days, which gradually reduced with delay in sowing from 26 September to 11 November respec- tively. Forage yield was significantly improved by application of nitrogen at 160 kg N/ha compared to lower nitro- gen levels. Response of nitrogen to forage yield of turnip was linear. Net returns ( 62,411/ha) and ( 56,534/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.57) and (2.34) were the highest with 26 September sowing and 160 kg N/ha respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 26 September gave significantly higher plant height than sowing on 26 October and 11 November.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e0“A field experiment was conducted at the ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana”
e1“The crop sown on 26 September recorded sig- nificantly higher plant height, number of leaves, forage yield, and nitrogen uptake than that sown on 26 October and 11 November”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 26 September gave higher number of leaves, forage yield and nitrogen uptake than later sowing.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e1“The crop sown on 26 September recorded sig- nificantly higher plant height, number of leaves, forage yield, and nitrogen uptake than that sown on 26 October and 11 November”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher plant height and forage yield reflect a higher accumulation of growing degree-days.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e2“Higher values of plant height and forage yield were the reflection of higher accumulation of growing degree-days”
Claim · model-written summary
Accumulation of growing degree-days gradually reduced with delay in sowing from 26 September to 11 November.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e3“higher accumulation of growing degree-days, which gradually reduced with delay in sowing from 26 September to 11 November”
Claim · model-written summary
Forage yield was significantly improved by 160 kg N/ha compared with lower nitrogen levels.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e4“Forage yield was significantly improved by application of nitrogen at 160 kg N/ha compared to lower nitro- gen levels”
Claim · model-written summary
The response of forage yield of turnip to nitrogen was linear.
- Taxon
- turnip
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica rapa subsp. rapae5 - Treatment
- nitrogene5
- Outcome
- forage yielde5
- Qualifier
- lineare5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e5“Response of nitrogen to forage yield of turnip was linear”
Claim · model-written summary
Net returns were highest with sowing on 26 September (62,411/ha).
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e6“Net returns ( 62,411/ha) and ( 56,534/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.57) and (2.34) were the highest with 26 September sowing and 160 kg N/ha respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Net returns were highest with 160 kg N/ha (56,534/ha).
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e6“Net returns ( 62,411/ha) and ( 56,534/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.57) and (2.34) were the highest with 26 September sowing and 160 kg N/ha respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit to cost ratio was highest with 26 September sowing (2.57).
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e6“Net returns ( 62,411/ha) and ( 56,534/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.57) and (2.34) were the highest with 26 September sowing and 160 kg N/ha respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit to cost ratio was highest with 160 kg N/ha (2.34).
Verbatim
t0“Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)”
e6“Net returns ( 62,411/ha) and ( 56,534/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.57) and (2.34) were the highest with 26 September sowing and 160 kg N/ha respectively”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.