Paper · 2012 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Evaluation of drought tolerance from a wheat recombination inbred line population at the early seedling growth stage

Zhang Hong; Wang Honggang

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The drought tolerance of wheat seedlings from a recombination inbred line (RIL) population derived from crosses between Weimai 8 and Luohan2 and its parents was evaluated according to the drought tolerance indices of 11 early seedling traits and using principal component analysis and K-means clustering methods to select materials with good germplasm. Results indicated that drought could promote the increase of coleoptile length (CL) and inhibit seedling height (SH), longest root length (RL), seedling fresh weight (SFW), shoots fresh weight (STFW), root fresh weight (RFW), seedling dry weight (SDW), shoots dry weight (STDW), root dry weight (RDW), root-to-shoot fresh weight ratio (RSFWR), and root-to-shoot dry weight ratio (RSDWR). Two hundred forty-five lines from a RIL population and two parents were divided into three clusters. The parent Weimai 8 and 101 lines were attributed to drought-sensitive types; the parent Luohan 2 and 102 lines mediated drought-resistant types, and 42 lines were highly drought-resistant types. Whether or not a relatively strong root system could be formed was the most important condition in evaluating the drought tolerance of wheat at the seedling stage. Key words: Recombination inbred line, evaluation of drought tolerance, seedling growth stage, principal component analysis and cluster analysis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased coleoptile length in wheat seedlings.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
coleoptile lengthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought could promote the increase of coleoptile length (CL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought inhibited seedling height, longest root length, and seedling fresh weight.

Outcome
seedling height (SH), longest root length (RL), seedling fresh weight (SFW)e0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibit seedling height (SH), longest root length (RL), seedling fresh weight (SFW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought inhibited shoot and root fresh weight and seedling dry weight.

Outcome
shoots fresh weight (STFW), root fresh weight (RFW), seedling dry weight (SDW)e0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibit seedling height (SH), longest root length (RL), seedling fresh weight (SFW), shoots fresh weight (STFW), root fresh weight (RFW), seedling dry weight (SDW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought inhibited shoot and root dry weight and root-to-shoot fresh weight ratio.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
shoots dry weight (STDW), root dry weight (RDW), root-to-shoot fresh weight ratio (RSFWR)e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots dry weight (STDW), root dry weight (RDW), root-to-shoot fresh weight ratio (RSFWR), and root-to-shoot dry weight ratio (RSDWR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought could promote the increase of coleoptile length (CL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought inhibited root-to-shoot dry weight ratio.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
root-to-shoot dry weight ratioe0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root-to-shoot dry weight ratio (RSDWR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought could promote the increase of coleoptile length (CL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–436 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The population and parents were divided into three drought-tolerance clusters.

Material
RIL populatione0
Outcome
three clusterse0
Value
threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two hundred forty-five lines from a RIL population and two parents were divided into three clusters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weimai 8 and 101 lines were drought-sensitive.

Material
Weimai 8e0
Outcome
drought-sensitive typese0
Value
101 linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The parent Weimai 8 and 101 lines were attributed to drought-sensitive types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Luohan 2 and 102 lines were drought-resistant.

Material
Luohan 2e0
Outcome
drought-resistant typese0
Value
102 linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the parent Luohan 2 and 102 lines mediated drought-resistant types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty-two lines were highly drought-resistant.

Outcome
highly drought-resistant typese0
Value
42 linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“42 lines were highly drought-resistant types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A strong root system was identified as the most important condition for assessing seedling drought tolerance.

Organ / stage
root systeme0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whether or not a relatively strong root system could be formed was the most important condition in evaluating the drought tolerance of wheat at the seedling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1201 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.