Abstract
All insecticides was effective in reducing jassids and thrips population on groundnut and imidacloprid 0.003% and dimethoate 0.04% exhibited highest efficacy. Among the insecticidal treatments tested in field, imidacloprid showed significantly superior in controlling jassids and thrips population and thereby, reduction in leaf damage and increasing in yield. Highest incremental cost benefit ratio 1: 16.52 was observed in imidacloprid followed by dimethoate (1: 12.75) treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 0.003% had highest efficacy against jassids.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid 0.003%e0
- Interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- jassids and thrips populatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- All insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All insecticides was effective in reducing jassids and thrips population on groundnut and imidacloprid 0.003% and dimethoate 0.04% exhibited highest efficacy.”
t0“jassid (Empoasca kerri Pruthi)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 0.003% had highest efficacy against thrips.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid 0.003%e0
- Outcome
- thrips populatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- All insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“All insecticides was effective in reducing jassids and thrips population on groundnut and imidacloprid 0.003% and dimethoate 0.04% exhibited highest efficacy.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate at 0.04% had highest efficacy against jassids and thrips.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- dimethoate 0.04%e0
- Interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- jassids and thrips populatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- All insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“All insecticides was effective in reducing jassids and thrips population on groundnut and imidacloprid 0.003% and dimethoate 0.04% exhibited highest efficacy.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field imidacloprid significantly outperformed other insecticides in controlling jassids and thrips.
- Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- jassids and thrips populatione0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- insecticidal treatmentse0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the insecticidal treatments tested in field, imidacloprid showed significantly superior in controlling jassids and thrips population”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid reduced leaf damage.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- leaf damagee0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“imidacloprid showed significantly superior in controlling jassids and thrips population and thereby, reduction in leaf damage”
e1“population on groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid increased groundnut yield.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“imidacloprid showed significantly superior in controlling jassids and thrips population and thereby, reduction in leaf damage and increasing in yield”
e1“population on groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid had the highest incremental cost benefit ratio, 1: 16.52.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Outcome
- incremental cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 1: 16.52e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Highest incremental cost benefit ratio 1: 16.52 was observed in imidacloprid followed by dimethoate (1: 12.75) treatments.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate had an incremental cost benefit ratio of 1: 12.75, below imidacloprid.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- dimethoatee0
- Outcome
- incremental cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1: 12.75e0
- Comparator
- imidaclopride0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Highest incremental cost benefit ratio 1: 16.52 was observed in imidacloprid followed by dimethoate (1: 12.75) treatments.”
t0“Groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →imidacloprid · Thrips · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →dimethoate · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
imidacloprid · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.