Paper · 2016 · Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova

Effects of Salicylic Acid Elicitor and Potassium Fertilizer as Foliar Spray on Canola Production in the Reclaimed Land in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt

S.M. Kamel; H.M. Mahfouz; H.A. Blal; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, during 2013/’14 and 2014/’15 seasons, to determine the effects of salicylic acid elicitor (SA) and potassium fertilizer (K) as foliar spray on canola production in the reclaimed land. Canola plants were sprayed with three rates of K and SA separately and together. The concentrations of SA with a surfactant triton 0.1% and concentrations of K sprayed after 30 days of sowing by one week interval for three times using hydraulic sprayer. Results indicated that K and SA provided good nutrition and resistance for pathogens, enhanced plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, fruiting zone (cm), seed yield/plant (g), seed yield/fed and oil percentage of canola cultivar (Serw 4) in the reclaimed land. K and SA separately or in combination at the rate of (6.0 cm −1 + 300 mg −1 SA) provided the best nutrition for enhancing resistance of plants against biotic and a biotic factors, consequently, enhancing vegetative growth and yield production during seasons of study 2013/’14 and 2014/’15.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K and SA spraying enhanced height, branch number and fruiting zone.

Material
Serw 4e0
Treatment
K and SAe0
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, fruiting zone (cm)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K and SA provided good nutrition and resistance for pathogens, enhanced plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, fruiting zone (cm), seed yield/plant (g), seed yield/fed and oil percentage of canola cultivar (Serw 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K and SA spraying enhanced seed yield per plant and per feddan.

Material
Serw 4e0
Treatment
K and SAe0
Outcome
seed yield/plant (g), seed yield/fede0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K and SA provided good nutrition and resistance for pathogens, enhanced plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, fruiting zone (cm), seed yield/plant (g), seed yield/fed and oil percentage of canola cultivar (Serw 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K and SA spraying enhanced oil percentage.

Material
Serw 4e0
Treatment
K and SAe0
Outcome
oil percentagee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K and SA provided good nutrition and resistance for pathogens, enhanced plant height (cm), number of branches/plant, fruiting zone (cm), seed yield/plant (g), seed yield/fed and oil percentage of canola cultivar (Serw 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report K and SA enhanced pathogen resistance.

Treatment
K and SAe0
Outcome
resistance for pathogense0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K and SA provided good nutrition and resistance for pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated combined K and SA rate gave the best growth and yield response.

Treatment
6.0 cm −1 + 300 mg −1 SAe0
Outcome
vegetative growth and yield productione0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K and SA separately or in combination at the rate of (6.0 cm −1 + 300 mg −1 SA) provided the best nutrition for enhancing resistance of plants against biotic and a biotic factors, consequently, enhancing vegetative growth and yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.