Paper · 2015 · EPH - International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research

NODULATION AND BIOMASS YIELD RESPONSE OF COWPEA TO ROW SPACING AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER APPLICATION IN THE GUINEA SAVANNA AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONE OF GHANA

Alhassan Bawa; Lukman Yussif

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Phosphorus fertilizer application and planting distance play a major role in the production of shoot, root and nodule dry biomass of cowpea. However, phosphorus is a major limiting nutrient in soils in Ghana. Selection of cowpea varieties that produce good biomass yield under low soil phosphorus or those with high phosphorus response efficiency can be a low input approach in solving this problem in Ghana. Two-season experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of phosphorus (P) fertilizer and row spacing on growth, nodulation and biomass yield in cowpea. Each of the two experiments comprised of 16 treatment combinations of 4 cowpea varieties, 2 levels of row spacing and 2 levels of P2O5 application laid out in a 4 x 2 x 2 factorial experiments in RCBD with four replications. The cowpea varieties were IT x P 148, Valenga, Bengkpla and DPC. The levels of row spacing were 60 x 20 cm and 40 x 20 cm, whilst the levels of P were 0 and 30 kgha-1 P2O5. The study revealed that varieties DPC and Valenga performed relatively better with respect to shoot and root dry biomass production, number of nodules produced and nodule dry biomass production across both levels of row spacing and phosphorus fertilizer application. The study further established that row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and P level of 30 kgha-1 also produced significantly higher quantities of shoot and root dry biomass, number of nodules and nodule dry biomass as compared to row spacing of 40 cm x 20 cm and P level of 0 kgha-1. For the purpose of producing leguminous fodder crops for feeding livestock, varieties DPC and Valenga should be cultivated for improved animal nutrition. Row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and phosphorus fertilizer application level of 30 kgha-1 should also be used for increased biomass yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPC had relatively better shoot and root biomass and nodulation across spacing and phosphorus levels.

Material
DPCe0
Outcome
shoot and root dry biomass production, number of nodules produced and nodule dry biomass productione0
Direction
relatively bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varieties DPC and Valenga performed relatively better with respect to shoot and root dry biomass production, number of nodules produced and nodule dry biomass production across both levels of row spacing and phosphorus fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Valenga had relatively better shoot and root biomass and nodulation across spacing and phosphorus levels.

Material
Valengae0
Outcome
shoot and root dry biomass production, number of nodules produced and nodule dry biomass productione0
Direction
relatively bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varieties DPC and Valenga performed relatively better with respect to shoot and root dry biomass production, number of nodules produced and nodule dry biomass production across both levels of row spacing and phosphorus fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported wider spacing and phosphorus treatment increased shoot and root dry biomass significantly.

Treatment
row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and P level of 30 kgha-1e0
Outcome
shoot and root dry biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
row spacing of 40 cm x 20 cm and P level of 0 kgha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and P level of 30 kgha-1 also produced significantly higher quantities of shoot and root dry biomass, number of nodules and nodule dry biomass as compared to row spacing of 40 cm x 20 cm and P level of 0 kgha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported wider spacing and phosphorus treatment increased nodule number and dry biomass significantly.

Treatment
row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and P level of 30 kgha-1e0
Outcome
number of nodules and nodule dry biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
row spacing of 40 cm x 20 cm and P level of 0 kgha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and P level of 30 kgha-1 also produced significantly higher quantities of shoot and root dry biomass, number of nodules and nodule dry biomass as compared to row spacing of 40 cm x 20 cm and P level of 0 kgha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend DPC for leguminous fodder production.

Material
DPCe0
Outcome
should be cultivated for improved animal nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the purpose of producing leguminous fodder crops for feeding livestock, varieties DPC and Valenga should be cultivated for improved animal nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Valenga for leguminous fodder production.

Material
Valengae0
Outcome
should be cultivated for improved animal nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the purpose of producing leguminous fodder crops for feeding livestock, varieties DPC and Valenga should be cultivated for improved animal nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 cm x 40 cm row spacing for increased biomass yield.

Treatment
Row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cme0
Outcome
increased biomass yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and phosphorus fertilizer application level of 30 kgha-1 should also be used for increased biomass yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1798 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend phosphorus application of 30 kgha-1 for increased biomass yield.

Treatment
phosphorus fertilizer application level of 30 kgha-1e0
Outcome
increased biomass yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing of 60 cm x 40 cm and phosphorus fertilizer application level of 30 kgha-1 should also be used for increased biomass yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1798 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

56 papers: 52 positive, 4 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

density · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.