Paper · 2017 · Nanoscale Research Letters

Effect of Zinc and Copper Nanoparticles on Drought Resistance of Wheat Seedlings

Nataliya Taran; Volodymyr Storozhenko; Nataliia Svietlova; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
289
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of a colloidal solution of Cu,Zn-nanoparticles on pro-oxidative/antioxidative balance and content of photosynthetic pigments and leaf area of winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc) and forest-steppe (Stolichna) ecotypes was investigated in drought conditions. It has been shown that Cu,Zn-nanoparticles decreased the negative effect of drought action upon plants of steppe ecotype Acveduc. In particular, increased activity of antioxidative enzymes reduced the level of accumulation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and stabilized the content of photosynthetic pigments and increased relative water content in leaves. Colloidal solution of Cu,Zn-nanoparticles had less significant influence on these indexes in seedlings of the Stolichna variety under drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu,Zn nanoparticles reduced drought damage in Acveduc wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Acveduce0
Treatment
Cu,Zn-nanoparticlese0
Outcome
negative effect of drought actione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu,Zn-nanoparticles decreased the negative effect of drought action upon plants of steppe ecotype Acveduc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–400 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidative enzyme activity increased in treated Acveduc plants under drought.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Acveduce1
Treatment
Cu,Zn-nanoparticlese1
Outcome
activity of antioxidative enzymese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased activity of antioxidative enzymes reduced the level of accumulation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–545 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu,Zn-nanoparticles decreased the negative effect of drought action upon plants of steppe ecotype Acveduc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–400 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TBARS accumulation declined in Acveduc under drought.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Acveduce1
Treatment
Cu,Zn-nanoparticlese1
Outcome
level of accumulation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased activity of antioxidative enzymes reduced the level of accumulation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–545 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu,Zn-nanoparticles decreased the negative effect of drought action upon plants of steppe ecotype Acveduc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–400 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigment content stabilized in Acveduc under drought.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Acveduce1
Treatment
Cu,Zn-nanoparticlese1
Outcome
content of photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
stabilizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stabilized the content of photosynthetic pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–599 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu,Zn-nanoparticles decreased the negative effect of drought action upon plants of steppe ecotype Acveduc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–400 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf relative water content increased in Acveduc under drought.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Acveduce1
Treatment
Cu,Zn-nanoparticlese1
Outcome
relative water content in leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased relative water content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu,Zn-nanoparticles decreased the negative effect of drought action upon plants of steppe ecotype Acveduc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–400 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles had less influence on the measured drought indexes in Stolichna than Acveduc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Stolichnae0
Treatment
Colloidal solution of Cu,Zn-nanoparticlese0
Outcome
these indexese0
Direction
less significant influencee0
Comparator
Acveduce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colloidal solution of Cu,Zn-nanoparticles had less significant influence on these indexes in seedlings of the Stolichna variety under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc) and forest-steppe (Stolichna) ecotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–231 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

copper atom · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

copper atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

copper atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.