Intervention effectmodel-written summary

TBARS accumulation declined in Acveduc under drought.

A claim from Effect of Zinc and Copper Nanoparticles on Drought Resistance of Wheat Seedlings · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TBARS accumulation declined in Acveduc under drought.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Acveduce1
Treatment
Cu,Zn-nanoparticlese1
Outcome
level of accumulation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased activity of antioxidative enzymes reduced the level of accumulation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–545
e1

“Cu,Zn-nanoparticles decreased the negative effect of drought action upon plants of steppe ecotype Acveduc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–400
e2

“winter wheat plants of steppe (Acveduc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–192

Title

Effect of Zinc and Copper Nanoparticles on Drought Resistance of Wheat Seedlings

Nataliya Taran; Volodymyr Storozhenko; Nataliia Svietlova; et al. Nanoscale Research Letters 2017. doi:10.1186/s11671-017-1839-9

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-cd24f4d167c28fbcf08f28359c4b655d0fc7ef2b83cab7ee1b9fa15442cad27a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

copper atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.