Paper · 2019 · Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

The effect of foliar application of copper on content of this element in winter wheat grain

Korzeniowska, Jolanta; Stanisławska-Glubiak, Ewa

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Copper is an essential element for plants, animals and people in small, but absolutely necessary quantities. Defi ciency of this element in the diet causes many health problems at animals and people. The content of Cu in wheat grain in Poland has decreased by about 20% over the past 30 years, which adversely affects its nutritional value. The aim of the study was to examine the possibility of increasing the copper content in winter wheat grain by foliar application of this element. In 2003–2006, six oneyear fi eld trials were conducted with copper foliar fertilization of 10 varieties of winter wheat. Spraying with copper sulfate at a dose of 305 g ha was performed in spring in full tillering stage. The average density of copper in the grain was at a very low level of 2,4–2,6 mg kg. Such a content is not enough in terms of nutritional needs of livestock. Single copper spray did not cause a statistically signifi cant increase in the content of this element in the grain of any of the tested varieties. At the same time, varieties that reacted with the highest, approximately a 20% increase in yield to the application of copper, showed a 11–12% decrease in Cu content of grain. This decline was most likely the dilution effect. key words: wheat, copper content, foliar application, dilution effect

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain Cu content in Poland fell about 20% over 30 years.

Outcome
content of Cu in wheat graine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 20%e0
Setting
Polande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of Cu in wheat grain in Poland has decreased by about 20% over the past 30 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average winter wheat grain copper concentration was 2,4–2,6 mg kg.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
density of copper in the graine0
Value
2,4–2,6 mg kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average density of copper in the grain was at a very low level of 2,4–2,6 mg kg.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A single copper spray produced no statistically significant increase in grain copper content in any tested variety.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Single copper spraye0
Outcome
content of this element in the graine0
Direction
did not cause a statistically signifi cant increasee0
Qualifier
any of the tested varietiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single copper spray did not cause a statistically signifi cant increase in the content of this element in the grain of any of the tested varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties with the highest yield response to copper had approximately 20% higher yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
application of coppere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
approximately a 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varieties that reacted with the highest, approximately a 20% increase in yield to the application of copper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those high yield response varieties had an 11–12% decrease in grain Cu content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
application of coppere0
Outcome
Cu content of graine0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
11–12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varieties that reacted with the highest, approximately a 20% increase in yield to the application of copper, showed a 11–12% decrease in Cu content of grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the grain Cu decrease most likely to dilution.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
decrease in Cu content of graine1
Qualifier
dilution effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This decline was most likely the dilution effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“decrease in Cu content of grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

copper atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 97 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.