Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 1 kg ha-1 copper dose significantly increased yield compared with the untreated control, averaged over three years.

A claim from Investigation of the Effect of a New Type of Copper–Sucrose Complex Compound on the Yield and Quality Parameters of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1 kg ha-1 copper dose significantly increased yield compared with the untreated control, averaged over three years.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
1 kg ha−1 copper dosee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
Across the three-year averagee1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151
e1

“Across the three-year average, significant increases were observed starting from the 1 kg ha−1 copper dose in yield, from 0.3 kg ha−1 in crude protein content, and from 0.5 kg ha−1 in wet gluten content compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–622

Title

Investigation of the Effect of a New Type of Copper–Sucrose Complex Compound on the Yield and Quality Parameters of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Renátó Kalocsai; Zsolt Giczi; Dávid Vasas; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15071506

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c6571799ee8eaa49adaba5c26c99770b2fa79651699e69df3c9c6b7727683880 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.