Paper · 2009 · PubMed

Effect of copper on growth, yield and concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.).

Ratan Kumar; N K Mehrotra; B D Nautiyal; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
79
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted at six graded levels of copper (Cu) viz., 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1) to test the response of wheat plants grown in a copper-responsive alluvial soil (entisol) under glass house conditions. The growth attributes like plant height, fresh and dry matter yield, percent dry matter enhanced with increasing Cu levels and was maximum at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu while the number of tillers was minimum at this level. The grain yield at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu was enhanced by 62.9% from the control. The increase in weight of 1000 grains ranged from 33.93 to 41.35 g in comparison to control (32.58 g). Harvest index (%) also increased and ranged from 39.42 to 47.73 in different treatments in comparison to control (35.92). Both 1000 grain weight and harvest index were maximum in the plants at 1.5 mg kg(-1) copper. Cu concentrations in leaves, grain and straw enhanced with increasing levels of Cu application. The Fe concentration in leaves was significantly reduced by Cu application and the reduction was 10.3% at 2.5 mg kg(-1) Cu and was not influenced in by Cu application in grain and straw. The Mn concentration was not affected by Cu application in any of the plant part studied. However, Zn concentration decreased significantly at higher levels of Cu (2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1)) in leaves and remained unaffected in the grain and straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant height rose with copper levels and peaked at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu levelse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
1.5 mg kg(-1) Cue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth attributes like plant height, fresh and dry matter yield, percent dry matter enhanced with increasing Cu levels and was maximum at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu while the number of tillers was minimum at this level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fresh and dry matter yield rose with copper levels and peaked at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu levelse0
Outcome
fresh and dry matter yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
1.5 mg kg(-1) Cue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth attributes like plant height, fresh and dry matter yield, percent dry matter enhanced with increasing Cu levels and was maximum at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu while the number of tillers was minimum at this level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

percent dry matter rose with copper levels and peaked at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu levelse0
Outcome
percent dry mattere0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
1.5 mg kg(-1) Cue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth attributes like plant height, fresh and dry matter yield, percent dry matter enhanced with increasing Cu levels and was maximum at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu while the number of tillers was minimum at this level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller number was lowest at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
1.5 mg kg(-1) Cue0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth attributes like plant height, fresh and dry matter yield, percent dry matter enhanced with increasing Cu levels and was maximum at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu while the number of tillers was minimum at this level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased 62.9% at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu versus control.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
1.5 mg kg(-1) Cue0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
62.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield at 1.5 mg kg(-1) Cu was enhanced by 62.9% from the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper treatments increased thousand grain weight to 33.93 to 41.35 g versus 32.58 g in control.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cut0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33.93 to 41.35 ge0
Qualifier
32.58 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in weight of 1000 grains ranged from 33.93 to 41.35 g in comparison to control (32.58 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index increased to 39.42 to 47.73 across treatments versus 35.92 in control.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Harvest index (%)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.42 to 47.73e0
Qualifier
35.92e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index (%) also increased and ranged from 39.42 to 47.73 in different treatments in comparison to control (35.92).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand grain weight and harvest index were highest at 1.5 mg kg(-1) copper.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
1.5 mg kg(-1) coppere0
Outcome
1000 grain weight and harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both 1000 grain weight and harvest index were maximum in the plants at 1.5 mg kg(-1) copper.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu concentration in leaves increased with Cu application.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
Cu concentrationse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu concentrations in leaves, grain and straw enhanced with increasing levels of Cu application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu concentration in grain increased with Cu application.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
Cu concentrationse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu concentrations in leaves, grain and straw enhanced with increasing levels of Cu application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu concentration in straw increased with Cu application.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
Cu concentrationse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu concentrations in leaves, grain and straw enhanced with increasing levels of Cu application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu application significantly reduced leaf Fe concentration by 10.3% at 2.5 mg kg(-1) Cu.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
Fe concentration in leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10.3%e0
Qualifier
2.5 mg kg(-1) Cue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fe concentration in leaves was significantly reduced by Cu application and the reduction was 10.3% at 2.5 mg kg(-1) Cu and was not influenced in by Cu application in grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu application did not influence Fe concentration in grain.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
Fe concentratione0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fe concentration in leaves was significantly reduced by Cu application and the reduction was 10.3% at 2.5 mg kg(-1) Cu and was not influenced in by Cu application in grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu application did not influence Fe concentration in straw.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
Fe concentratione0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fe concentration in leaves was significantly reduced by Cu application and the reduction was 10.3% at 2.5 mg kg(-1) Cu and was not influenced in by Cu application in grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu application did not affect Mn concentration in studied plant parts.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu applicatione0
Outcome
Mn concentratione0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
any of the plant part studiede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Mn concentration was not affected by Cu application in any of the plant part studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Cu levels significantly reduced leaf Zn concentration.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
higher levels of Cu (2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1))e0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, Zn concentration decreased significantly at higher levels of Cu (2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1)) in leaves and remained unaffected in the grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn concentration in grain remained unaffected at higher Cu levels.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
higher levels of Cu (2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1))e0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, Zn concentration decreased significantly at higher levels of Cu (2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1)) in leaves and remained unaffected in the grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn concentration in straw remained unaffected at higher Cu levels.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
higher levels of Cu (2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1))e0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, Zn concentration decreased significantly at higher levels of Cu (2.0 and 2.5 mg kg(-1)) in leaves and remained unaffected in the grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.