Abstract
A B S T R A C T Two field experiments were conducted in the successive winter seasons 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 at the Agricultural Experiment and Research Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University to study the effect of Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn foliar application on yield and quality of four wheat cultivars (Sids 13, Sakha 94, Misr 1 and Gemeiza 7 ). A spilt-plot design in a randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Results showed that foliar application by all micronutrients gave significant effect on yield traits and protein content in both seasons compared with control treatment. Moreover, foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn) produced the highest values of plant height (85.03 and 87.17 cm), tillers number m -2 (318.4 and 329.3), spikes number m -2 (279.33 and 282.9), spike length (9.32 and 9.56 cm), number of spikelets spike -1 (16.26 and 16.37), number of grains spike -1 (39.73 and 40.98), 1000-grain weight (42.50 and 43.26 g), grain yield (6.270 and 6.400 ton ha -1 ) , straw yield (12.58 and 12.77 ton ha -1 ), biological yield (18.84 and 19.17 ton ha -1 ) and harvest index (33.21 and 33.36 %), respectively, in both seasons followed by Zn foliar application followed by Mn foliar application followed by Fe foliar application then Cu foliar application. Among wheat cultivars Sids 13 cultivar ranked 1 st in all yield traits and protein content in both seasons followed by Misr 1 followed by Gemeiza 7 cultivar. Howeve, Sakha 94 gave the lowest values of yield traits and protein content. It concluded that sowing Sids 13 cultivar with foliar application micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn) produce
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient foliar applications significantly affected wheat yield traits and protein content versus control in both seasons.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application by all micronutrientse0
- Outcome
- yield traits and protein contente0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application by all micronutrients gave significant effect on yield traits and protein content in both seasons compared with control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat plant height in the two seasons: 85.03 and 87.17 cm.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 85.03 and 87.17 cme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“plant height (85.03 and 87.17 cm)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat tillers number m -2 in the two seasons: 318.4 and 329.3.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- tillers number m -2e1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 318.4 and 329.3e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“tillers number m -2 (318.4 and 329.3)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat spikes number m -2 in the two seasons: 279.33 and 282.9.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- spikes number m -2e1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 279.33 and 282.9e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“spikes number m -2 (279.33 and 282.9)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat spike length in the two seasons: 9.32 and 9.56 cm.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- spike lengthe1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 9.32 and 9.56 cme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“spike length (9.32 and 9.56 cm)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat number of spikelets spike -1 in the two seasons: 16.26 and 16.37.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- number of spikelets spike -1e1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 16.26 and 16.37e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“number of spikelets spike -1 (16.26 and 16.37)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat number of grains spike -1 in the two seasons: 39.73 and 40.98.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- number of grains spike -1e1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 39.73 and 40.98e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“number of grains spike -1 (39.73 and 40.98)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat 1000-grain weight in the two seasons: 42.50 and 43.26 g.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- 1000-grain weighte1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 42.50 and 43.26 ge1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“1000-grain weight (42.50 and 43.26 g)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat grain yield in the two seasons: 6.270 and 6.400 ton ha -1.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 6.270 and 6.400 ton ha -1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“grain yield (6.270 and 6.400 ton ha -1)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat straw yield in the two seasons: 12.58 and 12.77 ton ha -1.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 12.58 and 12.77 ton ha -1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“straw yield (12.58 and 12.77 ton ha -1)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat biological yield in the two seasons: 18.84 and 19.17 ton ha -1.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- biological yielde1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 18.84 and 19.17 ton ha -1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“biological yield (18.84 and 19.17 ton ha -1)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrient foliar application gave the highest wheat harvest index in the two seasons: 33.21 and 33.36 %.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)e0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 33.21 and 33.36 %e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“foliar application wit combination of micronutrients (Cu+Fe+Mn+Zn)”
e1“harvest index (33.21 and 33.36 %)”
e2“produced the highest values of plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn, Mn, Fe, and Cu foliar applications followed the combination in that order for the reported yield traits.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- Zn foliar application followed by Mn foliar application followed by Fe foliar application then Cu foliar applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“followed by Zn foliar application followed by Mn foliar application followed by Fe foliar application then Cu foliar application”
Claim · model-written summary
Sids 13 ranked first for yield traits and protein content in both seasons, followed by Misr 1 and Gemeiza 7.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Sids 13e0
- Outcome
- yield traits and protein contente0
- Direction
- ranked 1 ste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Sids 13 cultivar ranked 1 st in all yield traits and protein content in both seasons followed by Misr 1 followed by Gemeiza 7 cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Sakha 94 had the lowest yield traits and protein content.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- Sakha 94e0
- Outcome
- yield traits and protein contente0
- Direction
- loweste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Sakha 94 gave the lowest values of yield traits and protein content”
The same questions in other papers
manganese atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →iron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
196 papers more in this group
See all 200 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.