Paper · 1997 · HortScience

Multi-site Thinning Comparisons with `Empire' and `McIntosh' Apples

Alan N. Lakso; Terence L. Robinson; Eddie W. Stover; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Many chemical, environmental, and physiological factors have been reported to be important to apple chemical thinning, so we have been developing a multi-site and multi-year database of chemical thinning results and potentially important factors. For 3 years, we have conducted replicated thinning trials in `Empire' and `McIntosh' apple orchards at six or seven sites around New York state in different climatic regions. Different concentrations of NAA and Accel (primarily benzyladenine), NAA/carbaryl and Accel/carbaryl combinations and unthinned controls were tested with treatments applied at the 10-mm king fruit stage by airblast sprayers. Flower cluster counts, set counts, yields, fruit sizes, and other factors thought important to thinning response (orchard condition/history, weather, application conditions, etc.) were measured or estimated in each trial. Analysis of factor importance is continuing, but some general results have come from the thinning trials so far. Thinning effectiveness varied among years from poor to adequate. There have not been consistent thinner concentration responses. Commercial NAA and Accel concentrations have not thinned adequately. NAA/carbaryl and Accel/carbaryl have thinned the most. For the same crop load, trees thinned with Accel or the carbaryl combination have had better fruit size than when thinned with NAA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning effectiveness varied among years from poor to adequate.

Outcome
Thinning effectivenesse0
Qualifier
among yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning effectiveness varied among years from poor to adequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinner concentration responses were inconsistent.

Outcome
thinner concentration responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There have not been consistent thinner concentration responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial NAA concentrations did not thin adequately.

Treatment
Commercial NAAe0
Outcome
thinned adequatelye0
Direction
not thinned adequatelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Commercial NAA and Accel concentrations have not thinned adequately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial Accel concentrations did not thin adequately.

Treatment
Accel concentrationse0
Outcome
thinned adequatelye0
Direction
not thinned adequatelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Commercial NAA and Accel concentrations have not thinned adequately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NAA/carbaryl combination thinned the most.

Treatment
NAA/carbaryle0
Outcome
thinnede0
Direction
moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA/carbaryl and Accel/carbaryl have thinned the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Accel/carbaryl combination thinned the most.

Treatment
Accel/carbaryle0
Outcome
thinnede0
Direction
moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA/carbaryl and Accel/carbaryl have thinned the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same crop load, Accel produced better fruit size than NAA.

Treatment
Accele0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
same crop loade0
Comparator
NAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the same crop load, trees thinned with Accel or the carbaryl combination have had better fruit size than when thinned with NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same crop load, the carbaryl combination produced better fruit size than NAA.

Treatment
the carbaryl combinatione0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
same crop loade0
Comparator
NAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the same crop load, trees thinned with Accel or the carbaryl combination have had better fruit size than when thinned with NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑

carbaryl · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

42 papers: 32 positive, 10 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.