Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Carbaryl thinning in 2000 had no effect on spur fruit abscission or growth.

A claim from Individual and combined effects of shading and thinning chemicals on abscission and dry-matter accumulation of ‘Royal Gala’ apple fruit · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl thinning in 2000 had no effect on spur fruit abscission or growth.

Treatment
Carbaryl in 2000e0
Outcome
abscission or growth of spur fruite0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical fruit thinning treatments (Carbaryl in 2000, BA or delayed lime sulphur in 2001) had no effect on abscission or growth of spur fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–750
t0

“‘Royal Gala’ apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–129

Title

Individual and combined effects of shading and thinning chemicals on abscission and dry-matter accumulation of ‘Royal Gala’ apple fruit

S. Mcartney; M. White; I. Latter; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2004. doi:10.1080/14620316.2004.11511787

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-d31cd054be7067f4b918d2b80f7de34afa6acc3b965d864923a71748948dccce · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

carbaryl · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

42 papers: 32 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.