Paper · 2006 · HortScience

Chemical Blossom Thinining on Prunus in New York

Jason L. Osborne; Terence L. Robinson

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In 2004, we conducted a chemical thinning field study in Appleton, N.Y., on 5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock. Treatments included soybean oil or petroleum oil applied at 8% about 30 days before budbreak. Ammonium thio-sulfate (ATS) 3.5 gal/acre, ATS 5.0 gal/acre, lime sulfur (1%, 3%) plus Crockers fish oil 2 gal/acre, and Wilthin 6 pt/acre were applied at FB; and the grower standard hand-thinning treatment at 45 DAFB. Trees treated with thinning agents were not given supplemental hand thinning. The high rate of ATS, 5.0 gal/acre and Wilthin 6 pt/acre had the greatest thinning effect and reduced fruit set by 55% and 61%, respectively, compared to the untreated control. The high rate of ATS also increased fruit size 25%, but reduced yield by 45%. Soybean and petroleum oil treatments did not significantly reduce fruit set. Lime sulfur plus fish oil treatments 1% and 3% also did not significantly reduce fruit set. Although a significant reduction in yield was observed in the high rate ATS and Wilthin treatments, a greater proportion of the crop was in the larger size categories. In 2005, treatments included soybean oil 8% plus Latron B 1956 applied 18 days and 25 days before FB, Lime sulfur (2%, 4%) plus Crockers fish oil (2%) applied at FB, Ammonium thio-sulfate (ATS) 3.5%, 5.0%, Wilthin 1.9, 2.8 L (Entek, Inc.), plus Regulaid 473 mL per 935 L/ha applied at FB, Entry 1.5, 3.0%, Tergitol TMN-6 0.75, 1.5%, hand-thin flowers to a crop load of seven fruits per cm 2 at FB and hand-thin fruit to 7 fruits per cm 2 applied 45 days after FB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate ATS (5.0 gal/acre) reduced fruit set by 55% compared with untreated control.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
high rate of ATS, 5.0 gal/acree2
Outcome
fruit sete2
Direction
reducede2
Value
55%e2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“The high rate of ATS, 5.0 gal/acre and Wilthin 6 pt/acre had the greatest thinning effect and reduced fruit set by 55% and 61%, respectively, compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilthin 6 pt/acre reduced fruit set by 61% compared with untreated control.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Wilthin 6 pt/acree2
Outcome
fruit sete2
Direction
reducede2
Value
61%e2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“The high rate of ATS, 5.0 gal/acre and Wilthin 6 pt/acre had the greatest thinning effect and reduced fruit set by 55% and 61%, respectively, compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate ATS increased fruit size by 25%.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
high rate of ATSe3
Outcome
fruit sizee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
25%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“The high rate of ATS also increased fruit size 25%, but reduced yield by 45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate ATS reduced yield by 45%.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
high rate of ATSe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Value
45%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“The high rate of ATS also increased fruit size 25%, but reduced yield by 45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean and petroleum oil treatments did not significantly reduce fruit set.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Soybean and petroleum oile4
Outcome
fruit sete4
Direction
did not significantly reducee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soybean and petroleum oil treatments did not significantly reduce fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime sulfur plus fish oil at 1% and 3% did not significantly reduce fruit set.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Lime sulfur plus fish oil treatments 1% and 3%e5
Outcome
fruit sete5
Direction
did not significantly reducee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lime sulfur plus fish oil treatments 1% and 3% also did not significantly reduce fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-rate ATS and Wilthin treatments significantly reduced yield.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
high rate ATS and Wilthin treatmentse6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
significant reductione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e6

“Although a significant reduction in yield was observed in the high rate ATS and Wilthin treatments, a greater proportion of the crop was in the larger size categories”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-rate ATS and Wilthin treatments gave a greater proportion of the crop in the larger size categories.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
high rate ATS and Wilthin treatmentse6
Outcome
greater proportion of the crope6
Direction
greatere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“5-year-old `Rising Star' peach trees on Lovell rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–132 · show in text ↑
e6

“Although a significant reduction in yield was observed in the high rate ATS and Wilthin treatments, a greater proportion of the crop was in the larger size categories”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1114 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

ammonium thiosulfate · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

lime · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.