Abstract
Abstract Supplemental N fertilization significantly increased survival and yield of Elberta peach trees growing in a severe decline area. There was a trend for supplemental N plus dolomitic lime to give further increases in tree survival and individual tree yields but did not significantly influence nutrient content of leaves. Trees did not respond to peach root residue applications.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental nitrogen significantly increased Elberta peach tree survival in a severe decline area.
- Taxon
- peach trees
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- Elbertae0
- Treatment
- Supplemental N fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- survivale0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- severe decline areae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Supplemental N fertilization significantly increased survival and yield of Elberta peach trees growing in a severe decline area.”
Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental nitrogen significantly increased Elberta peach tree yield in a severe decline area.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Material
- Elbertae0
- Treatment
- Supplemental N fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- severe decline areae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Supplemental N fertilization significantly increased survival and yield of Elberta peach trees growing in a severe decline area.”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding dolomitic lime to supplemental nitrogen showed a trend toward further tree survival increases.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- supplemental N plus dolomitic limee0
- Outcome
- tree survivale0
- Direction
- further increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“supplemental N plus dolomitic lime to give further increases in tree survival and individual tree yields”
t0“peach trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding dolomitic lime to supplemental nitrogen showed a trend toward further individual tree yield increases.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- supplemental N plus dolomitic limee0
- Outcome
- individual tree yieldse0
- Direction
- further increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“supplemental N plus dolomitic lime to give further increases in tree survival and individual tree yields”
t0“peach trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental nitrogen plus dolomitic lime did not significantly change leaf nutrient content.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- supplemental N plus dolomitic limee0
- Outcome
- nutrient content of leavese0
- Direction
- did not significantly influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“supplemental N plus dolomitic lime to give further increases in tree survival and individual tree yields but did not significantly influence nutrient content of leaves”
t0“peach trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Peach trees did not respond to peach root residue applications.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- peach root residue applicationse0
- Outcome
- did not responde0
- Direction
- did not responde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trees did not respond to peach root residue applications.”
t0“peach trees”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →lime · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
lime · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.