Paper · 2016 · HAYATI Journal of Biosciences

Application of Bioameliorant and Biofertilizers to Increase the Soil Health and Rice Productivity

Tualar Simarmata; Hersanti; Tien Turmuktini; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
110
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The major rice intensity of diseases in Indonesia was increased significantly and has caused a yield loss of up to 20–30%. The experiments had been conducted to investigate the effect of bioameliorant or composted straw (CS) combined with consortia of biofertilizers (CB) and biocontrol agent to restore the soil health and promote the induced systemic resistance (ISR) for increasing the rice productivity. The experiment arranged as randomized block design consisted of 12 treatments (0, 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 ton of CS per ha combined with 400 g of CB and 200 g inoculant of CB + 200 g inoculant of Trichoderma sp and was provided with three replications. The experimental results revealed that application of 2.5–7.5 ton per ha of bioameliorant combined with 400 g per ha of CB and 400 g Trichoderma sp has increased the ISR and enhanced the rice productivity significantly. The brown spot, sheath rice blight and bacterial leaf blight diseases were reduced from 16.7% to 3.3–8.0%, 20% to 4–10%, 24% to 2.7–4.7% and 20.7% to 8–14.0%, respectively at 7 weeks after transplanting. In addition, the rice grain yield was increased from about 7.1 ton ha−1 to 7.9–10.1 ton per ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application significantly increased rice induced systemic resistance.

Treatment
2.5–7.5 ton per ha of bioameliorant combined with 400 g per ha of CB and 400 g Trichoderma spe0
Interactor
Trichoderma spTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
ISRe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 2.5–7.5 ton per ha of bioameliorant combined with 400 g per ha of CB and 400 g Trichoderma sp has increased the ISR and enhanced the rice productivity significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rice productivity significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application significantly enhanced rice productivity.

Treatment
2.5–7.5 ton per ha of bioameliorant combined with 400 g per ha of CB and 400 g Trichoderma spe0
Interactor
Trichoderma spTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rice productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 2.5–7.5 ton per ha of bioameliorant combined with 400 g per ha of CB and 400 g Trichoderma sp has increased the ISR and enhanced the rice productivity significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice brown spot incidence fell from 16.7% to 3.3–8.0%.

Outcome
brown spote0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16.7% to 3.3–8.0%e0
Qualifier
at 7 weeks after transplantinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The brown spot, sheath rice blight and bacterial leaf blight diseases were reduced from 16.7% to 3.3–8.0%, 20% to 4–10%, 24% to 2.7–4.7% and 20.7% to 8–14.0%, respectively at 7 weeks after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice sheath blight incidence fell from 20% to 4–10%.

Outcome
sheath rice blighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20% to 4–10%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The brown spot, sheath rice blight and bacterial leaf blight diseases were reduced from 16.7% to 3.3–8.0%, 20% to 4–10%, 24% to 2.7–4.7% and 20.7% to 8–14.0%, respectively at 7 weeks after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice bacterial leaf blight incidence fell from 24% to 2.7–4.7%.

Outcome
bacterial leaf blighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24% to 2.7–4.7%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The brown spot, sheath rice blight and bacterial leaf blight diseases were reduced from 16.7% to 3.3–8.0%, 20% to 4–10%, 24% to 2.7–4.7% and 20.7% to 8–14.0%, respectively at 7 weeks after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield rose from about 7.1 to 7.9–10.1 tons per hectare.

Outcome
rice grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.9–10.1 ton per hae0
Qualifier
about 7.1 ton ha−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice grain yield was increased from about 7.1 ton ha−1 to 7.9–10.1 ton per ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1173 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Trichoderma · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 106 positive, 52 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.