Paper · 1992 · HortScience

THE INFLUENCE OF CONTINUOUS AND INTERMITTENT CO2 ENRICHMENT ON THE GROWTH, PRODUCTIVITY, AND PHYSIOLOGY OF GREENHOUSE TOMATO

A. Gagnon; S. Yelle; A. Gosselin

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to examine the influence of continuous and intermittent carbon dioxide enrichment on the growth of greenhouse tomato plants. Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes: Control at 330 ppm, continuous supply at 1000 ppm, and intermittent supply (1h supply/2 hours) at 1000 ppm and 2000 ppm. Carbon enrichment produced an increase in photosynthetic rate and plant dry weight, a decrease in leaf nitrate level, and leaf accumulation of reducing sugars and starch. A loss in efficiency was observed over time in plants grown under high atmospheric C02 concentration. However, intermittent carbon enrichment reduced the plant acclimation. Even with 32% less C02, intermittent enrichment at 1000 ppm produced yields 6% greater than continuous enrichment. The superior yield may be explained by preferential allocation of photosynthates to the fruit under intermittent supply.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon enrichment increased photosynthetic rate and plant dry weight of tomato relative to control at 330 ppm.

Treatment
Carbon enrichmente2
Outcome
photosynthetic rate and plant dry weighte2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
Control at 330 ppme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Carbon enrichment produced an increase in photosynthetic rate and plant dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–414 · show in text ↑
e3

“Control at 330 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon enrichment decreased leaf nitrate level of tomato relative to control at 330 ppm.

Treatment
Carbon enrichmente2
Outcome
leaf nitrate levele2
Direction
decreasee2
Comparator
Control at 330 ppme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Carbon enrichment produced an increase in photosynthetic rate and plant dry weight, a decrease in leaf nitrate level, and leaf accumulation of reducing sugars and starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–501 · show in text ↑
e3

“Control at 330 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon enrichment increased leaf accumulation of reducing sugars and starch in tomato relative to control at 330 ppm.

Treatment
Carbon enrichmente2
Outcome
leaf accumulation of reducing sugars and starche2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
Control at 330 ppme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Carbon enrichment produced an increase in photosynthetic rate and plant dry weight, a decrease in leaf nitrate level, and leaf accumulation of reducing sugars and starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–501 · show in text ↑
e3

“Control at 330 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A loss in efficiency over time was observed in tomato plants grown under high atmospheric CO2.

Treatment
high atmospheric C02 concentratione2
Outcome
A loss in efficiencye2
Qualifier
over timee2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“A loss in efficiency was observed over time in plants grown under high atmospheric C02 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent carbon enrichment reduced plant acclimation of tomato.

Treatment
intermittent carbon enrichmente2
Outcome
plant acclimatione2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, intermittent carbon enrichment reduced the plant acclimation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent enrichment at 1000 ppm produced tomato yields 6% greater than continuous enrichment, even with 32% less CO2.

Treatment
intermittent enrichment at 1000 ppme2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
greatere2
Value
6%e2
Qualifier
Even with 32% less C02e2
Comparator
continuous enrichmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Even with 32% less C02, intermittent enrichment at 1000 ppm produced yields 6% greater than continuous enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–789 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The superior tomato yield under intermittent supply may be explained by preferential allocation of photosynthates to the fruit.

Outcome
superior yielde2
Qualifier
preferential allocation of photosynthates to the fruit under intermittent supplye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato plants were grown under four CO2 regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“The superior yield may be explained by preferential allocation of photosynthates to the fruit under intermittent supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–910 · show in text ↑