Paper · 2017 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Evaluation of Integrated Nutrient Management Interventions for Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) on a Vertisol in Central India

Dendi Damodar Reddy; Desouza Blaise; Bhagwan Kumrawat; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton. Seed cotton yield in the PC (2501–2579 kg ha−1) was similar to the recommended INM (2673 kg ha−1) treatment and was significantly better than nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (100% NPK) (2130 kg ha−1) and farmers practice (FP) (1886 kg ha−1). Yield was lower in the PM (2476–2617 kg ha−1) than in the PC. Nutrient uptake was higher in all INM intervention plots due to an improvement in soil nutrient status compared with those receiving 100% NPK. Soil labile carbon values were higher in the INM treatments (333–452 mg kg−1), with a greater magnitude in the PC-amended plots (402–452 mg kg−1). Carbon management index (CMI) values were higher for the INM than treatments NPK and FP. Among INM interventions, PC plots had higher values than the PM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield with phospho-compost was similar to the recommended INM treatment.

Treatment
Phospho-composte0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Value
2501–2579 kg ha−1e1
Comparator
recommended INMe1
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed cotton yield in the PC (2501–2579 kg ha−1) was similar to the recommended INM (2673 kg ha−1) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield with phospho-compost was significantly better than 100% NPK.

Treatment
Phospho-composte0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde1
Direction
bettere2
Value
2501–2579 kg ha−1e1
Qualifier
2130 kg ha−1e2
Comparator
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (100% NPK)e2
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed cotton yield in the PC (2501–2579 kg ha−1) was similar to the recommended INM (2673 kg ha−1) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–259 · show in text ↑
e2

“was significantly better than nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (100% NPK) (2130 kg ha−1) and farmers practice (FP) (1886 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield with phospho-compost was significantly better than farmers practice.

Treatment
Phospho-composte0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde1
Direction
bettere2
Value
2501–2579 kg ha−1e1
Qualifier
1886 kg ha−1e2
Comparator
farmers practice (FP)e2
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed cotton yield in the PC (2501–2579 kg ha−1) was similar to the recommended INM (2673 kg ha−1) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–259 · show in text ↑
e2

“was significantly better than nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (100% NPK) (2130 kg ha−1) and farmers practice (FP) (1886 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield with poultry manure was lower than with phospho-compost.

Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
Yielde4
Direction
lowere4
Value
2476–2617 kg ha−1e4
Comparator
PCe4
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“Yield was lower in the PM (2476–2617 kg ha−1) than in the PC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake was higher in all INM intervention plots than with 100% NPK, owing to improved soil nutrient status.

Treatment
INM interventione5
Outcome
Nutrient uptakee5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
due to an improvement in soil nutrient statuse5
Comparator
100% NPKe5
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nutrient uptake was higher in all INM intervention plots due to an improvement in soil nutrient status compared with those receiving 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil labile carbon values were higher in the INM treatments (333–452 mg kg−1).

Treatment
INM treatmentse6
Outcome
Soil labile carbon valuese6
Direction
highere6
Value
333–452 mg kg−1e6
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil labile carbon values were higher in the INM treatments (333–452 mg kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phospho-compost amended plots had a greater magnitude of soil labile carbon (402–452 mg kg−1) than the INM treatments.

Treatment
PC-amended plotse7
Outcome
Soil labile carbon valuese6
Direction
greater magnitudee7
Value
402–452 mg kg−1e7
Comparator
INM treatmentse6
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e6

“Soil labile carbon values were higher in the INM treatments (333–452 mg kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–679 · show in text ↑
e7

“with a greater magnitude in the PC-amended plots (402–452 mg kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon management index values were higher for the INM treatments than for NPK and farmers practice.

Treatment
INMe1
Outcome
Carbon management index (CMI) valuese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
treatments NPK and FPe1
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carbon management index (CMI) values were higher for the INM than treatments NPK and FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the INM interventions, phospho-compost plots had higher values than poultry manure plots.

Treatment
PC plotse2
Outcome
valuese2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
Among INM interventionse2
Comparator
the PMe2
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phospho-compost (PC) and poultry manure (PM) were evaluated in field experiments to diversify integrated nutrient management (INM) for rain-fed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among INM interventions, PC plots had higher values than the PM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–901 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 497 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.