Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cotton treatment with farmyard manure, especially with fertilizer N, improved or maintained available soil N, P, and K.

A claim from Productivity and Sustainability of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cropping System as Influenced by Prilled Urea, Farmyard Manure and Azotobacter · 2004

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton treatment with farmyard manure, especially with fertilizer N, improved or maintained available soil N, P, and K.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
soil fertility status in terms of available N, P and Ke0
Direction
improve or maintaine0
Qualifier
especially when fertilizer N was also appliede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment in cotton that included FYM, especially when fertilizer N was also applied could either improve or maintain the soil fertility status in terms of available N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–720

Title

Productivity and Sustainability of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cropping System as Influenced by Prilled Urea, Farmyard Manure and Azotobacter

A. Das; M. Prasad; Y. S. Shivay; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2004.00110.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-6ba0ea3c485865cace339dc9ce8f34f8f166f27f8c1b267d5b84e9e3fece1130 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.