Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined nitrogen, manure, and Azotobacter increased cotton yield attributes and mean seed cotton yield to 2.33 Mg ha −1.

A claim from Productivity and Sustainability of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cropping System as Influenced by Prilled Urea, Farmyard Manure and Azotobacter · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen, manure, and Azotobacter increased cotton yield attributes and mean seed cotton yield to 2.33 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
combined application of 30 kg N and farmyard manure (FYM) at 12 Mg ha −1 along with Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
yield attributes and mean seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.33 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“considerable increase in yield attributes and mean seed cotton yield (2.33 Mg ha −1 ) with the combined application of 30 kg N and farmyard manure (FYM) at 12 Mg ha −1 along with Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–531

Title

Productivity and Sustainability of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cropping System as Influenced by Prilled Urea, Farmyard Manure and Azotobacter

A. Das; M. Prasad; Y. S. Shivay; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2004.00110.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-d4466a9287c8a63f70470d7a67ae8bd0e0ff3fd71a1a45620650578ee15e02e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this claim · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

334 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

541 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.