Abstract
The disposal of swine slurry is becoming a serious problem due to pollutant effects of the nitrogen and phosphorus content of this material. To evaluate the possibility of application of swine effluent as fertilizer for peach orchard, a field test was started in 2008. Methodologies and the early results are presented in this paper. The trial has been conducted in a 'Spring Bright' necatrine commercial orchard in Cuneo province, Northern Italy, in a 1-ha study area following a randomized block design with three replications of five treatments: liquid slurry (LS), covered slurry (CS), solid fraction (SF), mineral nutrition (MN). Also a no-fertilized (NF) treatment was added in order to better discriminate the effect of the different fertilizations above the field nutrients content. Optimal quantity of liquid and solid materials and best surface for distribution were also calculated. Measurements of yield, yield efficiency and crop load were used to evaluate the orchard productivity. Fruit quality was assessed at harvest and after refrigeration (4 to 5°C) storage for ten days in normal atmosphere. Using ANOVA no statistically significant differences were found in productivity and fruit quality. This was the case for fruit refrigerated for 10 days. The preliminary results show that there are no differences in orchard productivity and fruit quality using swine liquid manure as fertilizer. Nevertheless, long term application have to be investigated before confirming these results. Therefore we will have to wait till the end of the experiments for the final results.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization treatments showed no statistically significant productivity difference.
- Taxon
- NECTARINE
Prunus persica var. nucipersicat0 - Treatment
- swine liquid manuree1
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- no statistically significant differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Using ANOVA no statistically significant differences were found in productivity and fruit quality.”
t0“NECTARINE”
e1“using swine liquid manure as fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization treatments showed no statistically significant fruit quality difference, including after refrigeration.
- Taxon
- NECTARINE
Prunus persica var. nucipersicat0 - Treatment
- swine liquid manuree1
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- no statistically significant differencese0
- Qualifier
- fruit refrigerated for 10 dayse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Using ANOVA no statistically significant differences were found in productivity and fruit quality. This was the case for fruit refrigerated for 10 days.”
t0“NECTARINE”
e1“using swine liquid manure as fertilizer”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.