Paper · 2017 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Hydraulic performance of different irrigation methods on chickpea and coriander intercropping in vertisol of Chhattisgarh plains

Jhalesh Kumar; P Katre; Kumari Chandrika; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the effective and efficient irrigation methods for realization of higher return and find out the effect of different irrigation methods on yield of chickpea and coriander intercropping system. The experiment was laid out in RBD in five treatments with four replications. The treatments comprised of five different irrigation methods viz. flood irrigation, furrow irrigation, sprinkler irrigation, drip irrigation and control in chickpea-coriander intercropping. The highest yield (11.78 q ha-1) was recorded in drip irrigation system followed by sprinkler irrigation (10.75 q ha-1), furrow irrigation (9.93 q ha-1), flood irrigation (9.86 q ha-1) and lowest yield found in control (5.22 q ha-1). The highest benefit cost ratio (2.03) was found in sprinkler irrigation and drip irrigation then followed by control (2.02), flood irrigation (1.80), furrow irrigation(1.74) and lowest was found in control (1.10). Water use efficiency was recorded highest in drip irrigation (4.71 kg/ha-mm of water) followed by sprinkler irrigation (4.30 kg/ha-mm of water), furrow irrigation (3.97 kg/ha-mm of water), flood irrigation (3.94 kg/ha-mm of water) and minimum was recorded under flood control (2.08 kg/ha-mm of water).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation yielded 11.78 q ha-1, the highest among irrigation methods.

Taxon
chickpea and corianderCicer arietinumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.78 q ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea and coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yield (11.78 q ha-1) was recorded in drip irrigation system followed by sprinkler irrigation (10.75 q ha-1), furrow irrigation (9.93 q ha-1), flood irrigation (9.86 q ha-1) and lowest yield found in control (5.22 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation yielded 10.75 q ha-1.

Taxon
chickpea and corianderCicer arietinumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
10.75 q ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea and coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yield (11.78 q ha-1) was recorded in drip irrigation system followed by sprinkler irrigation (10.75 q ha-1), furrow irrigation (9.93 q ha-1), flood irrigation (9.86 q ha-1) and lowest yield found in control (5.22 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow irrigation yielded 9.93 q ha-1.

Taxon
chickpea and corianderCicer arietinumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
furrow irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
9.93 q ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea and coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yield (11.78 q ha-1) was recorded in drip irrigation system followed by sprinkler irrigation (10.75 q ha-1), furrow irrigation (9.93 q ha-1), flood irrigation (9.86 q ha-1) and lowest yield found in control (5.22 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flood irrigation yielded 9.86 q ha-1.

Taxon
chickpea and corianderCicer arietinumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
flood irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
9.86 q ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea and coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest yield (11.78 q ha-1) was recorded in drip irrigation system followed by sprinkler irrigation (10.75 q ha-1), furrow irrigation (9.93 q ha-1), flood irrigation (9.86 q ha-1) and lowest yield found in control (5.22 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–703 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control yield was 5.22 q ha-1, the lowest.

Taxon
chickpea and corianderCicer arietinumCoriandrum sativumt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
5.22 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea and coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“lowest yield found in control (5.22 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–703 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler and drip irrigation gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.03.

Taxon
chickpea and corianderCicer arietinumCoriandrum sativumt0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea and coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest benefit cost ratio (2.03) was found in sprinkler irrigation and drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation had the highest water use efficiency, 4.71 kg/ha-mm of water.

Taxon
chickpea and corianderCicer arietinumCoriandrum sativumt0
Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
Water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.71 kg/ha-mm of watere0
Comparator
flood controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea and coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water use efficiency was recorded highest in drip irrigation (4.71 kg/ha-mm of water) followed by sprinkler irrigation (4.30 kg/ha-mm of water), furrow irrigation (3.97 kg/ha-mm of water), flood irrigation (3.94 kg/ha-mm of water) and minimum was recorded under flood control (2.08 kg/ha-mm of water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1219 · show in text ↑

flooding · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.