Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Study of the Potential Application of Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Control of Infection Caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Limanska N Korotaeva N; Biscola V Ivanytsia T; Merlich A Franco BDGM

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Inhibition of crown gall on test plants in case of co-inoculation with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) has been investigated. From nine LAB strains tested, eight reduced amount of galled carrot explants by 36.4-87.7% and decreased the intensity of disease manifestation. The antagonistic activity against Agrobacterium tumefaciens, in vitro, was due to the low pH of organic acids produced by LAB. However, in the same pH, different LAB cultures displayed various levels of inhibition in vivo. Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 12 with the best results in tumor inhibition on carrots, showed high antagonistic activity on surfaces of kalanchoe and grapevines. Depending on the method of inoculation, the culture of L. plantarum ONU 12 could protect from 72.7% to 100% of wounded kalanchoe tissues. Evaluation of number of surviving cuttings and amount of buds that grew indicated that co-inoculation with agrobacteria and LAB removed completely the negative influence of phytopathogen on grapevines and reduced the number of infected cuttings by approximately 80%. One-hour treatment with L. plantarum ONU 12 helped to decrease the number of infected plants by approximately 68%. The studied strain L. plantarum ONU 12 can be proposed for further evaluation of possibility of practical use in plant protection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight of nine LAB strains reduced galled carrot explants by 36.4-87.7%.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
LAB strainse0
Outcome
galled carrot explantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36.4-87.7%e0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From nine LAB strains tested, eight reduced amount of galled carrot explants by 36.4-87.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight LAB strains decreased disease manifestation intensity in carrot.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
LAB strainse0
Outcome
intensity of disease manifestatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From nine LAB strains tested, eight reduced amount of galled carrot explants by 36.4-87.7% and decreased the intensity of disease manifestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–264 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LAB organic acids inhibited Agrobacterium tumefaciens in vitro through low pH.

Interactor
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0pathogen
Outcome
antagonistic activitye0
Qualifier
low pH of organic acidse0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antagonistic activity against Agrobacterium tumefaciens, in vitro, was due to the low pH of organic acids produced by LAB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different LAB cultures produced different in vivo inhibition at the same pH.

Outcome
various levels of inhibitione0
Qualifier
same pHe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“in the same pH, different LAB cultures displayed various levels of inhibition in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 12 showed the best inhibition of carrot tumors.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 12e0
Outcome
tumor inhibitione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 12 with the best results in tumor inhibition on carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 12 showed high antagonistic activity on kalanchoe surfaces.

Taxon
kalanchoeKalanchoee0
Outcome
antagonistic activitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Kalanchoe
Kalanchoe · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Stan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed high antagonistic activity on surfaces of kalanchoe and grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–647 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 12 showed high antagonistic activity on grapevine surfaces.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Outcome
antagonistic activitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed high antagonistic activity on surfaces of kalanchoe and grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 12 protected 72.7% to 100% of wounded kalanchoe tissue depending on inoculation method.

Taxon
kalanchoeKalanchoee0
Treatment
culture of L. plantarum ONU 12e0
Outcome
wounded kalanchoe tissuese0
Direction
protecte0
Value
72.7% to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Kalanchoe
Kalanchoe · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Stan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on the method of inoculation, the culture of L. plantarum ONU 12 could protect from 72.7% to 100% of wounded kalanchoe tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with agrobacteria and LAB eliminated the pathogen’s negative influence on grapevine cutting survival and bud growth.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
co-inoculation with agrobacteria and LABe0
Outcome
number of surviving cuttings and amount of buds that grewe0
Direction
removed completelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of number of surviving cuttings and amount of buds that grew indicated that co-inoculation with agrobacteria and LAB removed completely the negative influence of phytopathogen on grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation reduced infected grapevine cuttings by approximately 80%.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
co-inoculation with agrobacteria and LABe0
Outcome
number of infected cuttingse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
approximately 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation with agrobacteria and LAB removed completely the negative influence of phytopathogen on grapevines and reduced the number of infected cuttings by approximately 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-hour L. plantarum ONU 12 treatment decreased infected plants by approximately 68%.

Treatment
One-hour treatment with L. plantarum ONU 12e0
Outcome
number of infected plantse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
approximately 68%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“One-hour treatment with L. plantarum ONU 12 helped to decrease the number of infected plants by approximately 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1167 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose further evaluation of L. plantarum ONU 12 for plant protection.

Outcome
practical use in plant protectione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The studied strain L. plantarum ONU 12 can be proposed for further evaluation of possibility of practical use in plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1298 · show in text ↑

inoculation · organism · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · survival · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.