Abstract
An investigation on the growth and cropping of sweet cherry trees, which were cultivated on heavy soil, was conducted for five years after planting (1997- 2001). The experiment included the self compatible cultivar Lapins grafted on ten rootstocks of differing vigour, including: F 12/I, Ma x Ma 14, PiKu 4.20, Gisela 4, Gisela 5, Gisela 12, Weiroot 13, Weiroot 72, Weiroot 158 and Edabriz. In our growing conditions, the cultivar Lapins did not yield as expected. On the rootstocks PiKu 4, 20 and Gisela 4 the highest yields were achieved, while trees on the rootstock F 12/1 had the lowest yield. The rootstock Edabriz was of the lowest vigour, while PiKu 4.20 was of the highest vigour. Our results supported those of others indicating that Gisela 5 is, among dwarf cherry rootstocks, the most promising for modern, intensive sweet cherry growing. In addition, the results indicated that the rootstock Gisela 4 is also promising for intensive orchards because is amongst the most dwarfing, precocious and productive rootstocks. Edabriz was too weak for commercial use.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Trees on the rootstocks PiKu 4.20 and Gisela 4 achieved the highest yields.
- Taxon
- SWEET CHERRY
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- rootstocks PiKu 4, 20 and Gisela 4e0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SWEET CHERRY”
e0“On the rootstocks PiKu 4, 20 and Gisela 4 the highest yields were achieved”
Claim · model-written summary
Trees on the rootstock F 12/1 had the lowest yield.
- Taxon
- SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- rootstock F 12/1e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SWEET CHERRY”
e0“trees on the rootstock F 12/1 had the lowest yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The rootstock Edabriz gave the lowest tree vigour.
- Taxon
- SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- rootstock Edabrize0
- Outcome
- vigoure0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SWEET CHERRY”
e0“The rootstock Edabriz was of the lowest vigour”
Claim · model-written summary
The rootstock PiKu 4.20 gave the highest tree vigour.
- Taxon
- SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- PiKu 4.20e0
- Outcome
- vigoure0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SWEET CHERRY”
e0“PiKu 4.20 was of the highest vigour”
Claim · model-written summary
Under the growing conditions of the experiment the cultivar Lapins did not yield as expected.
- Taxon
- SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
- Material
- Lapinse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SWEET CHERRY”
e0“the cultivar Lapins did not yield as expected”
Claim · model-written summary
Among dwarf cherry rootstocks, Gisela 5 is the most promising for modern, intensive sweet cherry growing.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- Gisela 5e0
- Outcome
- the most promising for modern, intensive sweet cherry growinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gisela 5 is, among dwarf cherry rootstocks, the most promising for modern, intensive sweet cherry growing”
Claim · model-written summary
The rootstock Gisela 4 is also promising for intensive orchards.
- Taxon
- SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- rootstock Gisela 4e0
- Outcome
- promising for intensive orchardse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SWEET CHERRY”
e0“the rootstock Gisela 4 is also promising for intensive orchards”
Claim · model-written summary
The rootstock Edabriz was too weak for commercial use.
- Taxon
- SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Edabrize0
- Outcome
- too weak for commercial usee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SWEET CHERRY”
e0“Edabriz was too weak for commercial use”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.