Paper · 2015 · Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

Stay-green Drought Adaptation Trait Enhances Sorghum Production in Sub-tropical Australia, Central-Western India and Sub-Saharan Africa

Andrew Borrell; Barbara George‐Jaeggli

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought during grain filling is a common challenge for sorghum production in north-eastern Australia, central-western India, and sub-Saharan Africa. We show that the stay-green drought adaptation trait enhances sorghum grain yield under post-anthesis drought in these three regions. A positive relationship between stay-green and yield was generally found in breeding trials in north-eastern Australia that sampled 1668 unique hybrid combinations and 23 environments. Physiological studies in Australia also found that introgressing four individual stay-green (Stg1–4) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into a senescent background reduced water demand before flowering and hence increased water supply during grain filling, resulting in higher grain yield relative to the senescent control. Studies in India found that various Stg QTLs affected both transpiration and transpiration efficiency, although these effects depended on the interaction between genetic background (S35 and R16) and individual QTLs. The yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to transpiration efficiency in S35 (R2 = 0.29) and R16 (R2 = 0.72), and was related to total water extracted in S35 (R2 = 0.41) but not in R16. Finally, sixty-eight stay-green enriched lines were evaluated in six countries in sub-Saharan Africa during the 2013/14 season. Analysis of the data from Kenya indicates that stay-green and grain size were positively correlated at two sites: Kiboko (high yielding, r2=0.25) and Masongaleni (low yielding, r2=0.37). Together, these studies suggest that stay-green is a beneficial trait for sorghum production in the semi-arid tropics and is a consequence of traits altering the plant water budget.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stay-green trait enhances sorghum grain yield under post-anthesis drought in three regions.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
post-anthesis droughte0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the stay-green drought adaptation trait enhances sorghum grain yield under post-anthesis drought in these three regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–281 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In north-eastern Australian breeding trials, stay-green and yield were positively related.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
sampled 1668 unique hybrid combinations and 23 environmentse2
Setting
north-eastern Australiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“A positive relationship between stay-green and yield was generally found in breeding trials in north-eastern Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–401 · show in text ↑
e2

“sampled 1668 unique hybrid combinations and 23 environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introgressing four Stg QTLs into a senescent background gave higher grain yield than the senescent control.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
introgressing four individual stay-green (Stg1–4) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into a senescent backgrounde3
Gene
Stg1–4e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
senescent controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“introgressing four individual stay-green (Stg1–4) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into a senescent background reduced water demand before flowering and hence increased water supply during grain filling, resulting in higher grain yield relative to the senescent control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introgressing four Stg QTLs into a senescent background reduced water demand before flowering.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
introgressing four individual stay-green (Stg1–4) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into a senescent backgrounde3
Gene
Stg1–4e3
Outcome
water demand before floweringe3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
senescent controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“introgressing four individual stay-green (Stg1–4) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into a senescent background reduced water demand before flowering and hence increased water supply during grain filling, resulting in higher grain yield relative to the senescent control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introgressing four Stg QTLs into a senescent background increased water supply during grain filling.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
introgressing four individual stay-green (Stg1–4) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into a senescent backgrounde3
Gene
Stg1–4e3
Outcome
water supply during grain fillinge3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
senescent controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“introgressing four individual stay-green (Stg1–4) quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into a senescent background reduced water demand before flowering and hence increased water supply during grain filling, resulting in higher grain yield relative to the senescent control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Various Stg QTLs affected transpiration and transpiration efficiency in India, depending on genetic background.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
S35 and R16e4
Gene
Stg QTLse4
Outcome
transpiration and transpiration efficiencye4
Qualifier
these effects depended on the interactione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“various Stg QTLs affected both transpiration and transpiration efficiency, although these effects depended on the interaction between genetic background (S35 and R16) and individual QTLs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to transpiration efficiency in S35 (R2 = 0.29).

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
S35e5
Outcome
yield variation unexplained by harvest indexe5
Value
R2 = 0.29e5
Qualifier
transpiration efficiencye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to transpiration efficiency in S35 (R2 = 0.29) and R16 (R2 = 0.72), and was related to total water extracted in S35 (R2 = 0.41) but not in R16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to transpiration efficiency in R16 (R2 = 0.72).

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
R16e5
Outcome
yield variation unexplained by harvest indexe5
Value
R2 = 0.72e5
Qualifier
transpiration efficiencye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to transpiration efficiency in S35 (R2 = 0.29) and R16 (R2 = 0.72), and was related to total water extracted in S35 (R2 = 0.41) but not in R16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to total water extracted in S35 (R2 = 0.41).

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
S35e5
Outcome
yield variation unexplained by harvest indexe5
Value
R2 = 0.41e5
Qualifier
total water extractede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to transpiration efficiency in S35 (R2 = 0.29) and R16 (R2 = 0.72), and was related to total water extracted in S35 (R2 = 0.41) but not in R16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield variation unexplained by harvest index was not related to total water extracted in R16.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
R16e5
Outcome
yield variation unexplained by harvest indexe5
Qualifier
total water extractede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield variation unexplained by harvest index was related to transpiration efficiency in S35 (R2 = 0.29) and R16 (R2 = 0.72), and was related to total water extracted in S35 (R2 = 0.41) but not in R16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kenya, stay-green and grain size were positively correlated at Kiboko (r2=0.25).

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
grain sizee6
Value
r2=0.25e6
Qualifier
positively correlatede6
Setting
Kibokoe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“Analysis of the data from Kenya indicates that stay-green and grain size were positively correlated at two sites: Kiboko (high yielding, r2=0.25) and Masongaleni (low yielding, r2=0.37)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1522 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kenya, stay-green and grain size were positively correlated at Masongaleni (r2=0.37).

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
grain sizee6
Value
r2=0.37e6
Qualifier
positively correlatede6
Setting
Masongalenie6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“Analysis of the data from Kenya indicates that stay-green and grain size were positively correlated at two sites: Kiboko (high yielding, r2=0.25) and Masongaleni (low yielding, r2=0.37)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1522 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stay-green is a beneficial trait for sorghum production in the semi-arid tropics.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
sorghum productione7
Setting
semi-arid tropicse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“Together, these studies suggest that stay-green is a beneficial trait for sorghum production in the semi-arid tropics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1641 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Stay-green is a consequence of traits altering the plant water budget.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
stay-greene7
Qualifier
traits altering the plant water budgete7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“stay-green is a beneficial trait for sorghum production in the semi-arid tropics and is a consequence of traits altering the plant water budget”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1704 · show in text ↑

transgenic · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.