Paper · 2017 · Research on Crops

Effect of photoperiod on growth characteristics in Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Zembla using high pressure sodium light

Sunil Kumar; M. C. Singh

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effect of photoperiod on growth characteristics in chrysanthemum cv. Zembla during 1st October 2014 to 20th December 2014 in naturally ventilated greenhouse at Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology (CPCT), IARI, New Delhi. Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments of day length extension illuminating from high pressure sodium (HPS) for 6, 9, 12, 15 days @ 15 h/day in growth chamber. All the growth parameters (plant height, number of leaves, internode length and leaf area)varied significantly during different stages of growth and found that the increase in photoperiod by 15 days using high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting resulted in a significant increase in stem elongation and leaf number. Increased plant height (46.25 and 42.70 cm), internodal length (2.70 and 2.63 cm) and leaf number (32.75 and 29.75) were observed in cv. Zembla due to long day extension treatments as compared to the control. Flower bud appeared at the earliest (57 days) in the plants without any exposure to the photoperiod. However, flower opening delayed with increase in day length exposure from 6 days (66 days) to 15 days (68 days) treatments. The results also revealed that supplemental high pressure sodium lighting significantly increased in plant height, internodal length as well as leaves number with increase in day length (photoperiod).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 15-day photoperiod extension with HPS lighting significantly increased stem elongation and leaf number in chrysanthemum.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
high pressure sodium (HPS) lightinge1
Outcome
stem elongation and leaf numbere1
Direction
significant increasee1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–349 · show in text ↑
e1

“the increase in photoperiod by 15 days using high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting resulted in a significant increase in stem elongation and leaf number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increased plant height (46.25 and 42.70 cm), internodal length (2.70 and 2.63 cm) and leaf number (32.75 and 29.75) were observed in cv. Zembla due to long day extension treatments as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long day extension increased plant height of chrysanthemum cv. Zembla (46.25 and 42.70 cm) compared with the control.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
long day extension treatmentse2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
Increasede2
Value
46.25 and 42.70 cme2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–349 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increased plant height (46.25 and 42.70 cm), internodal length (2.70 and 2.63 cm) and leaf number (32.75 and 29.75) were observed in cv. Zembla due to long day extension treatments as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long day extension increased internodal length of chrysanthemum cv. Zembla (2.70 and 2.63 cm) compared with the control.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
long day extension treatmentse2
Outcome
internodal lengthe2
Direction
Increasede2
Value
2.70 and 2.63 cme2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–349 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increased plant height (46.25 and 42.70 cm), internodal length (2.70 and 2.63 cm) and leaf number (32.75 and 29.75) were observed in cv. Zembla due to long day extension treatments as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long day extension increased leaf number of chrysanthemum cv. Zembla (32.75 and 29.75) compared with the control.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
long day extension treatmentse2
Outcome
leaf numbere2
Direction
Increasede2
Value
32.75 and 29.75e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–349 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increased plant height (46.25 and 42.70 cm), internodal length (2.70 and 2.63 cm) and leaf number (32.75 and 29.75) were observed in cv. Zembla due to long day extension treatments as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–990 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower bud appeared earliest (57 days) in chrysanthemum plants without photoperiod exposure.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Outcome
Flower bud appearede3
Value
57 dayse3
Qualifier
in the plants without any exposure to the photoperiode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–349 · show in text ↑
e3

“Flower bud appeared at the earliest (57 days) in the plants without any exposure to the photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing day length exposure from 6 to 15 days delayed flower opening of chrysanthemum (66 to 68 days).

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Treatment
day length exposuree4
Outcome
flower openinge4
Direction
delayede4
Value
68 dayse4
Comparator
6 days (66 days)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–349 · show in text ↑
e4

“flower opening delayed with increase in day length exposure from 6 days (66 days) to 15 days (68 days) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1215 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth parameters of chrysanthemum varied significantly during different stages of growth.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Organ / stage
different stages of growthe5
Outcome
growth parameterse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemum cv. Zembla was exposed under different photoperiodic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–349 · show in text ↑
e5

“All the growth parameters (plant height, number of leaves, internode length and leaf area)varied significantly during different stages of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–615 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

63 papers: 47 positive, 16 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.