Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Beverage Industry Effluent Irrigation on Growth and Yield of Barley

T.S. Punith Raj C.A. Srinivasamurthy; S. Bhaskar Prabhudev Dhumgond; S.S. Prakash

17
claims
57
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru during 2012-13 to study the effect of beverage industry effluent on soil properties, growth and yield of barley with ten treatments replicated thrice using RCBD design. The beverage industry effluent was neutral in reaction, medium in electrical conductivity (1.59 dSm-1), BOD (42.2 mg L-1) and COD (143 mg L-1) but low in plant nutrients content. Among the treatments, growth parameters like plant height (69.7 cm), number of tillers (199.6), number of effective tillers m-2 (253.0), length of ear head (8.3 cm), number of grains head-1 (20.1) and test weight (48.5 g) were significantly higher in the treatment receiving cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T10) at 60 DAS. Significantly higher dry matter production in leaf, stem, ear head and TDM were observed in T10. Cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum recorded significantly higher grain (4.70 t ha 1) and straw yield (5.99 t ha 1) of barley compared to other treatments. Significantly lower grain (3.05 t ha 1) and straw yield (4.35 t ha 1) were recorded in treatment with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The beverage industry effluent was neutral in reaction.

Outcome
neutral in reactione2

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e2

“The beverage industry effluent was neutral in reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The beverage industry effluent was low in plant nutrient content.

Outcome
plant nutrients contente3
Direction
lowe3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“low in plant nutrients content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The beverage industry effluent had an electrical conductivity of 1.59 dSm-1 (medium).

Outcome
electrical conductivitye4
Value
1.59 dSm-1e4

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e4

“medium in electrical conductivity (1.59 dSm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The beverage industry effluent had a BOD of 42.2 mg L-1.

Outcome
BODe5
Value
42.2 mg L-1e5

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e5

“BOD (42.2 mg L-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The beverage industry effluent had a COD of 143 mg L-1.

Outcome
CODe6
Value
143 mg L-1e6

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e6

“COD (143 mg L-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the T10 irrigation regime with beverage effluent, barley plant height was significantly higher at 60 DAS than under the other treatments (69.7 cm).

Treatment
cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume3
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
69.7 cme4
Qualifier
at 60 DASe3
Comparator
Among the treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“were significantly higher in the treatment receiving cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T10) at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–826 · show in text ↑
e4

“growth parameters like plant height (69.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the T10 irrigation regime with beverage effluent, barley number of tillers was significantly higher at 60 DAS than under the other treatments (199.6).

Treatment
cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume3
Outcome
number of tillerse4
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
199.6e4
Qualifier
at 60 DASe3
Comparator
Among the treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“were significantly higher in the treatment receiving cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T10) at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–826 · show in text ↑
e4

“number of tillers (199.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the T10 irrigation regime with beverage effluent, barley number of effective tillers m-2 was significantly higher at 60 DAS than under the other treatments (253.0).

Treatment
cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume3
Outcome
number of effective tillers m-2e4
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
253.0e4
Qualifier
at 60 DASe3
Comparator
Among the treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“were significantly higher in the treatment receiving cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T10) at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–826 · show in text ↑
e4

“number of effective tillers m-2 (253.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the T10 irrigation regime with beverage effluent, barley length of ear head was significantly higher at 60 DAS than under the other treatments (8.3 cm).

Organ / stage
ear heade4
Treatment
cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume3
Outcome
length of ear heade4
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
8.3 cme4
Qualifier
at 60 DASe3
Comparator
Among the treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“were significantly higher in the treatment receiving cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T10) at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–826 · show in text ↑
e4

“length of ear head (8.3 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the T10 irrigation regime with beverage effluent, barley number of grains head-1 was significantly higher at 60 DAS than under the other treatments (20.1).

Treatment
cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume3
Outcome
number of grains head-1e4
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
20.1e4
Qualifier
at 60 DASe3
Comparator
Among the treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“were significantly higher in the treatment receiving cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T10) at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–826 · show in text ↑
e4

“number of grains head-1 (20.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the T10 irrigation regime with beverage effluent, barley test weight was significantly higher at 60 DAS than under the other treatments (48.5 g).

Treatment
cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume3
Outcome
test weighte4
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
48.5 ge4
Qualifier
at 60 DASe3
Comparator
Among the treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
e3

“were significantly higher in the treatment receiving cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T10) at 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–826 · show in text ↑
e4

“test weight (48.5 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter production in leaf, stem and ear head of barley was significantly higher in T10 than in the other treatments.

Organ / stage
leaf, stem, ear heade5
Treatment
T10e5
Outcome
dry matter production in leaf, stem, ear heade5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significantly higher dry matter production in leaf, stem, ear head and TDM were observed in T10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter (TDM) of barley was significantly higher in T10 than in the other treatments.

Treatment
T10e5
Outcome
TDMe5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significantly higher dry matter production in leaf, stem, ear head and TDM were observed in T10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield under the T10 regime with beverage effluent was 4.70 t ha-1, significantly higher than other treatments.

Treatment
Cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume6
Outcome
graine6
Direction
significantly highere6
Value
4.70 t ha 1e6
Comparator
other treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum recorded significantly higher grain (4.70 t ha 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1076 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley straw yield under the T10 regime with beverage effluent was 5.99 t ha-1, significantly higher than other treatments.

Treatment
Cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume6
Outcome
straw yielde7
Direction
highere6
Value
5.99 t ha 1e7
Comparator
other treatmentse2
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“Cycle of 1 irrigation with fresh water + 2 irrigations with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum recorded significantly higher grain (4.70 t ha 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1076 · show in text ↑
e7

“straw yield (5.99 t ha 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1106 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield was 3.05 t ha-1, significantly lower with beverage effluent plus RDF without gypsum.

Treatment
beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsume4
Outcome
graine3
Direction
lowere3
Value
3.05 t ha 1e3
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Significantly lower grain (3.05 t ha 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1186 · show in text ↑
e4

“were recorded in treatment with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley straw yield was 4.35 t ha-1, significantly lower with beverage effluent plus RDF without gypsum.

Treatment
beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsume4
Outcome
straw yielde5
Direction
lowere3
Value
4.35 t ha 1e5
Setting
near Bengalurue1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of Pepsico Pvt. Ltd., near Bengaluru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Significantly lower grain (3.05 t ha 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1186 · show in text ↑
e4

“were recorded in treatment with beverage industry effluent + RDF without gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1296 · show in text ↑
e5

“straw yield (4.35 t ha 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1216 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

54 papers: 53 positive, 1 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

irrigation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

109 papers: 83 positive, 26 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 14 positive, 11 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

lime · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.