Paper · 2013

PHYTOREMEDIATION OF CADMIUM CONTAMINATED SOIL BY AUXIN ASSISTED BACTERIAL INOCULATION

Tariq Ali; Sajid Mahmood; Muhammad Yahya Khan; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Toxic level of cadmium (Cd) has been built up in soil profile due to over fertilization, industrial activities and irrigation with city wastewater. One of the remediation strategies of such contaminated soil is phytoextraction by using hyper-accumulator plants. Metal stress hinders plant growth in contaminated soils even hyper-accumulator plant cannot attain sufficient biomass for effective phytoremediation. Plant growth promoting bacteria and auxin help plants to cope with metal stress. A pot experiment was conducted where the efficacy of four different Cd tolerant bacterial isolates alone and in combination with auxin (10 -3 M) was evaluated to promote spinach growth in Cd contaminated soil. Results revealed that Cd contamination severely decreased the spinach growth. However, bacterial inoculation and auxin application improved the spinach growth and Cd uptake compared to control. But combined application of bacterial isolates and auxin was more pronounced for enhancing fresh and dry mass, and phytoextraction of Cd. Bacterial inoculation along with auxin increased the fresh and dry weight up to 261 and 45%, respectively, over control. Moreover, combined use of bacteria and auxin also enhanced the uptake of Cd by spinach up to 5.36 folds compared to control. Thus, synergistic use of bacteria and auxin could be a novel approach for improving plant growth under metals stress as well as for meaningful phytoremediation of metals contaminated soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium contamination severely decreased spinach growth.

Treatment
Cd contaminatione0
Outcome
spinach growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd contamination severely decreased the spinach growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation improved spinach growth relative to control.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
spinach growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculation and auxin application improved the spinach growth and Cd uptake compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin application improved spinach growth relative to control.

Treatment
auxin applicatione0
Outcome
spinach growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculation and auxin application improved the spinach growth and Cd uptake compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation improved cadmium uptake by spinach relative to control.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
Cd uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculation and auxin application improved the spinach growth and Cd uptake compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin application improved cadmium uptake by spinach relative to control.

Treatment
auxin applicatione0
Outcome
Cd uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculation and auxin application improved the spinach growth and Cd uptake compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial isolates and auxin enhanced fresh mass more than either treatment alone.

Treatment
combined application of bacterial isolates and auxine0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of bacterial isolates and auxin was more pronounced for enhancing fresh and dry mass, and phytoextraction of Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial isolates and auxin enhanced dry mass more than either treatment alone.

Treatment
combined application of bacterial isolates and auxine0
Outcome
dry masse0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of bacterial isolates and auxin was more pronounced for enhancing fresh and dry mass, and phytoextraction of Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial isolates and auxin enhanced cadmium phytoextraction more than either treatment alone.

Treatment
combined application of bacterial isolates and auxine0
Outcome
phytoextraction of Cde0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of bacterial isolates and auxin was more pronounced for enhancing fresh and dry mass, and phytoextraction of Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation with auxin increased spinach fresh weight by up to 261% over control.

Treatment
Bacterial inoculation along with auxine0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
261e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation along with auxin increased the fresh and dry weight up to 261 and 45%, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation with auxin increased spinach dry weight by up to 45% over control.

Treatment
Bacterial inoculation along with auxine0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation along with auxin increased the fresh and dry weight up to 261 and 45%, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacteria and auxin increased spinach cadmium uptake up to 5.36 folds versus control.

Treatment
combined use of bacteria and auxine0
Outcome
uptake of Cde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
5.36 foldse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined use of bacteria and auxin also enhanced the uptake of Cd by spinach up to 5.36 folds compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1288 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose combined bacteria and auxin for growth and phytoremediation in metal contaminated soils.

Treatment
synergistic use of bacteria and auxine0
Outcome
improving plant growth under metals stress as well as for meaningful phytoremediation of metals contaminated soilse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“synergistic use of bacteria and auxin could be a novel approach for improving plant growth under metals stress as well as for meaningful phytoremediation of metals contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1478 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

class · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.