Paper · 2017 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION

Evaluation of bio-efficacy of azoxystrobin 23 per cent SC against anthracnose disease of mango

N. THAMMAIAH; G.S.K. SWAMY

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 at farmers field of Gokak taluk, Belgaum district, Karnataka state to find out the efficacy of azoxystrobin 23 per cent SC anthracnose disease of mango. Results revealed that, two sprays of azoxystrobin 23 % SC @ 0.2% effectively controlled the anthracnose disease (12.23% as against 56.88% in control) followed by azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15% (13.53%) and azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1% (18.50%). The intensity of the disease was highest in control (56.88%). The treatment azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.2% recorded the highest yield of 67.84 kg/tree followed by azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%(66.34kg/tree) and azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15% (63.34kg/tree).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of azoxystrobin 23% SC at 0.2% effectively controlled mango anthracnose, giving 12.23% against 56.88% in control.

Treatment
two sprays of azoxystrobin 23 % SC @ 0.2%e1
Outcome
anthracnose diseasee1
Direction
effectively controllede1
Value
12.23%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose disease of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–210 · show in text ↑
e1

“two sprays of azoxystrobin 23 % SC @ 0.2% effectively controlled the anthracnose disease (12.23% as against 56.88% in control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin 23% SC at 0.15% effectively controlled mango anthracnose, giving 13.53% disease.

Treatment
azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15%e3
Outcome
anthracnose diseasee3
Direction
effectively controllede3
Value
13.53%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose disease of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–210 · show in text ↑
e3

“effectively controlled the anthracnose disease (12.23% as against 56.88% in control) followed by azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15% (13.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin 23% SC at 0.1% effectively controlled mango anthracnose, giving 18.50% disease.

Treatment
azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%e4
Outcome
anthracnose diseasee4
Direction
effectively controllede4
Value
18.50%e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose disease of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–210 · show in text ↑
e4

“effectively controlled the anthracnose disease (12.23% as against 56.88% in control) followed by azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15% (13.53%) and azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1% (18.50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease intensity was highest in the control of mango anthracnose (56.88%).

Outcome
intensity of the diseasee5
Direction
higheste5
Value
56.88%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose disease of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–210 · show in text ↑
e5

“The intensity of the disease was highest in control (56.88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin 23% SC at 0.2% gave the highest mango yield, 67.84 kg/tree, compared with 0.1%.

Treatment
azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.2%e6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Value
67.84 kg/treee6
Comparator
azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose disease of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–210 · show in text ↑
e6

“The treatment azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.2% recorded the highest yield of 67.84 kg/tree followed by azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%(66.34kg/tree) and azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15% (63.34kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango yield with azoxystrobin 23% SC at 0.1% was 66.34 kg/tree.

Treatment
azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%e7
Outcome
yielde6
Value
66.34kg/treee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose disease of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–210 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded the highest yield of 67.84 kg/tree followed by azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%(66.34kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–651 · show in text ↑
e7

“azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%(66.34kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–651 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango yield with azoxystrobin 23% SC at 0.15% was 63.34 kg/tree.

Treatment
azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15%e7
Outcome
yielde6
Value
63.34kg/treee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose disease of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–210 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded the highest yield of 67.84 kg/tree followed by azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.1%(66.34kg/tree) and azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15% (63.34kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–698 · show in text ↑
e7

“azoxystrobin 23% SC @ 0.15% (63.34kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–698 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.