Paper · 2013 · Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

Integrated disease management of stem end rot of mango in the Southern Philippines

C. Akem; O. S. Opiña; Teresita U. Dalisay; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research aimed to develop and evaluate pre- and postharvest management strategies to reduce stem end rot (SER) incidence and extend saleable life of 'Carabao' mango fruits in Southern Philippines. Preharvest management focused on the development and improvement of fungicide spray program, while postharvest management aimed to develop alternative interventions aside from hot water treatment (HWT). Field evaluation of systemic fungicides, namely azoxystrobin ( Amistar 25SC), tebuconazole ( Folicur 25WP), carbendazim ( Goldazim 500SC), difenoconazole ( Score 250SC) and azoxystrobin+difenoconazole ( Amistar Top), reduced blossom blight severity and improved fruit setting and retention, resulting in higher fruit yield but failed to sufficiently suppress SER incidence. Based on these findings, an improved fungicide spray program was developed taking into account the infection process of SER pathogens and fungicide resistance. Timely application of protectant (mancozeb) and systemic fungicides (azoxystrobin, carbendazim and difenoconazole) during the most critical stages of mango flower and fruit development ensured higher harvestable fruit yield and minimally lowered SER incidence. Control of SER was also achieved by employing postharvest treatment such as HWT (52-55°C for 10 min), which significantly prolonged the saleable life of mango fruits. However, extended hot water treatment (EHWT; 46°C pulp temperature for 15 min), rapid heat treatment (RHT; 59°C for 30-60 sec), fungicide dip and promising biological control agents failed to satisfactorily reduce SER and prolong saleable life. In contrast, the integration of the improved spray program as preharvest management practice, and postharvest treatments such as HWT and fungicide dips (azoxystrobin, 150-175 ppm; carbendazim, 312.5 ppm; and tebuconazole, 125-156 ppm), significantly reduced disease and extended marketable life for utmost 8 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field fungicides reduced blossom blight severity.

Treatment
systemic fungicidese0
Outcome
blossom blight severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field evaluation of systemic fungicides, namely azoxystrobin ( Amistar 25SC), tebuconazole ( Folicur 25WP), carbendazim ( Goldazim 500SC), difenoconazole ( Score 250SC) and azoxystrobin+difenoconazole ( Amistar Top), reduced blossom blight severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field fungicides improved fruit setting and retention.

Treatment
systemic fungicidese0
Outcome
fruit setting and retentione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field evaluation of systemic fungicides, namely azoxystrobin ( Amistar 25SC), tebuconazole ( Folicur 25WP), carbendazim ( Goldazim 500SC), difenoconazole ( Score 250SC) and azoxystrobin+difenoconazole ( Amistar Top), reduced blossom blight severity and improved fruit setting and retention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field fungicides increased fruit yield.

Treatment
systemic fungicidese1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in higher fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field evaluation of systemic fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field fungicides did not sufficiently suppress stem end rot incidence.

Treatment
systemic fungicidese1
Outcome
SER incidencee0
Direction
failed to sufficiently suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“failed to sufficiently suppress SER incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field evaluation of systemic fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved spray program increased harvestable fruit yield.

Treatment
Timely application of protectant (mancozeb) and systemic fungicides (azoxystrobin, carbendazim and difenoconazole)e0
Outcome
harvestable fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timely application of protectant (mancozeb) and systemic fungicides (azoxystrobin, carbendazim and difenoconazole) during the most critical stages of mango flower and fruit development ensured higher harvestable fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved spray program minimally lowered stem end rot incidence.

Treatment
Timely application of protectant (mancozeb) and systemic fungicides (azoxystrobin, carbendazim and difenoconazole)e0
Outcome
SER incidencee0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
minimallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timely application of protectant (mancozeb) and systemic fungicides (azoxystrobin, carbendazim and difenoconazole) during the most critical stages of mango flower and fruit development ensured higher harvestable fruit yield and minimally lowered SER incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment significantly prolonged saleable life.

Treatment
HWT (52-55°C for 10 min)e0
Outcome
saleable life of mango fruitse0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HWT (52-55°C for 10 min), which significantly prolonged the saleable life of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extended hot water treatment did not satisfactorily reduce stem end rot or prolong saleable life.

Treatment
extended hot water treatment (EHWT; 46°C pulp temperature for 15 min)e0
Outcome
SER and prolong saleable lifee0
Direction
failed to satisfactorily reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extended hot water treatment (EHWT; 46°C pulp temperature for 15 min), rapid heat treatment (RHT; 59°C for 30-60 sec), fungicide dip and promising biological control agents failed to satisfactorily reduce SER and prolong saleable life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid heat treatment did not satisfactorily reduce stem end rot or prolong saleable life.

Treatment
rapid heat treatment (RHT; 59°C for 30-60 sec)e0
Outcome
SER and prolong saleable lifee0
Direction
failed to satisfactorily reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rapid heat treatment (RHT; 59°C for 30-60 sec), fungicide dip and promising biological control agents failed to satisfactorily reduce SER and prolong saleable life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide dip alone did not satisfactorily reduce stem end rot or prolong saleable life.

Treatment
fungicide dipe0
Outcome
SER and prolong saleable lifee0
Direction
failed to satisfactorily reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide dip and promising biological control agents failed to satisfactorily reduce SER and prolong saleable life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological control agents did not satisfactorily reduce stem end rot or prolong saleable life.

Treatment
promising biological control agentse0
Outcome
SER and prolong saleable lifee0
Direction
failed to satisfactorily reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promising biological control agents failed to satisfactorily reduce SER and prolong saleable life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated spray and postharvest treatments significantly reduced disease.

Treatment
the integration of the improved spray program as preharvest management practice, and postharvest treatments such as HWT and fungicide dips (azoxystrobin, 150-175 ppm; carbendazim, 312.5 ppm; and tebuconazole, 125-156 ppm)e0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integration of the improved spray program as preharvest management practice, and postharvest treatments such as HWT and fungicide dips (azoxystrobin, 150-175 ppm; carbendazim, 312.5 ppm; and tebuconazole, 125-156 ppm), significantly reduced disease and extended marketable life for utmost 8 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1924 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated spray and postharvest treatments extended marketable life to at most eight days.

Treatment
the integration of the improved spray program as preharvest management practice, and postharvest treatments such as HWT and fungicide dips (azoxystrobin, 150-175 ppm; carbendazim, 312.5 ppm; and tebuconazole, 125-156 ppm)e0
Outcome
marketable lifee0
Direction
extendede0
Value
8 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integration of the improved spray program as preharvest management practice, and postharvest treatments such as HWT and fungicide dips (azoxystrobin, 150-175 ppm; carbendazim, 312.5 ppm; and tebuconazole, 125-156 ppm), significantly reduced disease and extended marketable life for utmost 8 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1924 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑

mancozeb · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

difenoconazole · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

azoxystrobin · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

azoxystrobin · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

carbendazim · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

8 of 19 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.