Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Evaluation of sensory attributes of mango fruits CV ‘Alphonso’ as influenced by pre-harvest treatments

B. Manasa; S. L. Jagadeesh; N. Thammaiah; et al.

6
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the present investigation, fruits of trees treated with Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cent scored higher for the colour and appearance of peel and pulp (7.91 and 8.15). This is further confirmed by the presence of significantly higher β carotene content (59.12 ppm) in the pulp of the mango fruits under the same treatment imparting a bright yellow colour to the pulp. Unimpeded and coordinated ripening process facilitated by Azoxystrobin lead to the maintenance of sensory quality of mango fruits. For similar reasons, this treatment scored significantly higher for texture (8.22), and taste and flavour (8.45) and therefore scored organoleptic ally superior for overall acceptability (8.18). Lack of colour development with lower β carotene (47.68 ppm) content followed by minimum sensory scores for peel (4.31), pulp (4.91), texture (4.82) and taste (4.59) of the control fruits made the control fruits organoleptic ally less acceptable (4.65).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin 0.1% sprays scored fruit colour and appearance of peel and pulp higher than the control.

Material
Alphonsot1
Organ / stage
peel and pulpe1
Treatment
Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cente1
Outcome
colour and appearance of peel and pulpe1
Direction
scored highere1
Value
7.91 and 8.15e1
Comparator
control fruitse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sensory attributes of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits of trees treated with Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cent scored higher for the colour and appearance of peel and pulp (7.91 and 8.15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–171 · show in text ↑
e5

“minimum sensory scores for peel (4.31), pulp (4.91), texture (4.82) and taste (4.59) of the control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–886 · show in text ↑
t1

“CV ‘Alphonso’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin-treated mango pulp had significantly higher beta-carotene content than the control.

Organ / stage
pulpe2
Treatment
Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cente1
Outcome
β carotene contente2
Direction
highere2
Value
59.12 ppme2
Qualifier
47.68 ppme7
Comparator
control fruitse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sensory attributes of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits of trees treated with Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cent scored higher for the colour and appearance of peel and pulp (7.91 and 8.15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–171 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher β carotene content (59.12 ppm) in the pulp of the mango fruits under the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–326 · show in text ↑
e7

“Lack of colour development with lower β carotene (47.68 ppm) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–767 · show in text ↑
e5

“minimum sensory scores for peel (4.31), pulp (4.91), texture (4.82) and taste (4.59) of the control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin-treated mango fruit scored significantly higher for texture than the control.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cente1
Outcome
texturee3
Direction
highere3
Value
8.22e3
Qualifier
4.82e5
Comparator
control fruitse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sensory attributes of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits of trees treated with Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cent scored higher for the colour and appearance of peel and pulp (7.91 and 8.15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–171 · show in text ↑
e3

“this treatment scored significantly higher for texture (8.22), and taste and flavour (8.45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–616 · show in text ↑
e5

“minimum sensory scores for peel (4.31), pulp (4.91), texture (4.82) and taste (4.59) of the control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin-treated mango fruit scored significantly higher for taste and flavour than the control.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cente1
Outcome
taste and flavoure3
Direction
highere3
Value
8.45e3
Qualifier
4.59e5
Comparator
control fruitse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sensory attributes of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits of trees treated with Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cent scored higher for the colour and appearance of peel and pulp (7.91 and 8.15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–171 · show in text ↑
e3

“this treatment scored significantly higher for texture (8.22), and taste and flavour (8.45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–616 · show in text ↑
e5

“minimum sensory scores for peel (4.31), pulp (4.91), texture (4.82) and taste (4.59) of the control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin-treated mango fruit scored superior overall acceptability compared with the control.

Treatment
Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cente1
Outcome
overall acceptabilitye5
Direction
superiore5
Value
8.18e5
Qualifier
4.65e6
Comparator
control fruitse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sensory attributes of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits of trees treated with Azoxystrobin sprays at 0.1 per cent scored higher for the colour and appearance of peel and pulp (7.91 and 8.15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–171 · show in text ↑
e5

“scored organoleptic ally superior for overall acceptability (8.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–697 · show in text ↑
e6

“made the control fruits organoleptic ally less acceptable (4.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–951 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin-facilitated ripening maintains the sensory quality of mango fruit.

Treatment
Azoxystrobine6
Outcome
maintenance of sensory qualitye6
Qualifier
Unimpeded and coordinated ripening processe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sensory attributes of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“Unimpeded and coordinated ripening process facilitated by Azoxystrobin lead to the maintenance of sensory quality of mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–502 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.