Paper · 2012 · Journal of Biotechnology & Biomaterials

Rapid In Vitro Micro Propagation Of Chick Pea (Cicer Arietinum L.) From Shoot Tip And Cotyledonary Node Explants

Ugandhar T; Venkateshwarlu M

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A rapid, simple and efficient protocol for in vitro multiple shoot induction and plantlet regeneration was achieved from two different explants of Cicer arietinum cv (ICCCR) (kranthi). The explants viz shoot tip and cotyledonary node were cultured on MS medium fortified with Benzyl Adeno Purine (BAP) (0.5-3.0 mg/L) and Kinetin (Kn) (0.5-3.0 mg/L) for multiple shoot induction. Multiple shoots proliferation was best observed at 2.0mg/L BAP from all the two explants within three weeks of culture. Of the two different explants tested, BAP was found to be more effective than Kinetin for shoot multiplication. The highest number of shoots (12.0 ± 0.3) was achieved on MS medium augmented with 2.0 mg/L BAP. The medium supplemented with (2.0 mg/L) BAP better than all other media concentrations in cotyledonary node explants. Individual shoots were aseptically excised and sub cultured in the same media for shoot elongation. The elongated shoots were transferred to Indole Butyric Acid (IBA) (0.5-1.0mg/L) and Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) (0.5-1.0mg/L) for root induction. Rooting was observed within two weeks of culture. MS medium supplemented with (1.0 mg/L) IBA proved better with seventy percent rooting after 25 days of implantation. Most of the roots were long and healthy. Rooted plantlets were successfully hardened under culture conditions and subsequently established in the field conditions. The recorded survival rate of the plants was 76.3%. Plants looked healthy with no visually detectable phenotypic variations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2.0 mg/L BAP, both explants showed their best multiple-shoot proliferation within three weeks.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Organ / stage
two explantse0
Treatment
2.0mg/L BAPe0
Outcome
Multiple shoots proliferatione0
Direction
best observede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple shoots proliferation was best observed at 2.0mg/L BAP from all the two explants within three weeks of culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP produced more shoot multiplication than Kinetin.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Treatment
BAPe0
Outcome
shoot multiplicatione0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
Kinetine0

Verbatim

e0

“Of the two different explants tested, BAP was found to be more effective than Kinetin for shoot multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS medium with 2.0 mg/L BAP yielded the maximum of 12.0 ± 0.3 shoots.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Treatment
2.0 mg/L BAPe0
Outcome
number of shootse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.0 ± 0.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of shoots (12.0 ± 0.3) was achieved on MS medium augmented with 2.0 mg/L BAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For cotyledonary node explants, 2.0 mg/L BAP medium outperformed other concentrations.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Organ / stage
cotyledonary node explantse0
Treatment
(2.0 mg/L) BAPe0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
all other media concentrationse0

Verbatim

e0

“The medium supplemented with (2.0 mg/L) BAP better than all other media concentrations in cotyledonary node explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting was observed within two weeks of culture.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Outcome
Rootinge0
Qualifier
within two weeks of culturee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting was observed within two weeks of culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS medium with 1.0 mg/L IBA produced 70% rooting after 25 days.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Treatment
(1.0 mg/L) IBAe0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
bettere0
Value
seventy percente0
Qualifier
after 25 days of implantatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“MS medium supplemented with (1.0 mg/L) IBA proved better with seventy percent rooting after 25 days of implantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most regenerated roots were long and healthy.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Outcome
roots were long and healthye0

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the roots were long and healthy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooted plantlets were hardened and established in field conditions.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Outcome
successfully hardened under culture conditions and subsequently established in the field conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Rooted plantlets were successfully hardened under culture conditions and subsequently established in the field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant survival was 76.3%.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Outcome
survival rate of the plantse0
Value
76.3%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The recorded survival rate of the plants was 76.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerated plants appeared healthy without visible phenotypic variation.

Taxon
Cicer Arietinum L.t0
Outcome
healthy with no visually detectable phenotypic variationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants looked healthy with no visually detectable phenotypic variations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer Arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.