Paper · 2017 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Relative efficacy of newer insecticides and biopesticides against Helicoverpa armigera (hub.) in chickpea

Krishanender Dinesh; R Bharu Singh; K Kavita; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted at instructional farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur during Rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15 to evaluate the efficacy of insecticides and biopesticides against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera H.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) variety GNG 1581. T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @ 200 ml/ha) was most effective, which caused (70.31, 73.08 and 72.04) and (72.86, 75.97 and 72.84) highest mean percent reduction in population of gram pod borer larvae. It was followed by Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 500 ml/ha. The biopesticide treatment of T6 (HaNPV 200 LE @ 250 ml/ha) and T7 (Bt.k 8 L @ 1lit/ha) were least effective against gram pod borer. The highest seed yield of 22.78 and 24.53 q ha-1 was obtained from T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/ha) and minimum yield 16.00 and 15.20 q ha-1 was recorded in T9 (HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/ha), during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15. The highest benefit: cost ratio of 1.26 and 1.42 was recorded in T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/ha) and minimum benefit cost ratio 1.03 and 1.04 was recorded in T9 (HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/ha, during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide had the highest reduction in gram pod borer larvae across assessments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Flubendiamide 480 SC @ 200 ml/hae0
Interactor
gram pod borere0pest
Outcome
population of gram pod borer larvaee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70.31, 73.08 and 72.04e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @ 200 ml/ha) was most effective, which caused (70.31, 73.08 and 72.04) and (72.86, 75.97 and 72.84) highest mean percent reduction in population of gram pod borer larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb was second in effectiveness against gram pod borer.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 500 ml/hae0
Outcome
followed by Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 500 ml/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was followed by Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 500 ml/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HaNPV 200 LE @ 250 ml/ha was among the least effective against gram pod borer.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
HaNPV 200 LE @ 250 ml/hae0
Interactor
gram pod borere0pest
Outcome
effective against gram pod borere0
Direction
least effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biopesticide treatment of T6 (HaNPV 200 LE @ 250 ml/ha) and T7 (Bt.k 8 L @ 1lit/ha) were least effective against gram pod borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt.k 8 L @ 1lit/ha was among the least effective against gram pod borer.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Bt.k 8 L @ 1lit/hae0
Interactor
gram pod borere0pest
Outcome
effective against gram pod borere0
Direction
least effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biopesticide treatment of T6 (HaNPV 200 LE @ 250 ml/ha) and T7 (Bt.k 8 L @ 1lit/ha) were least effective against gram pod borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide produced the highest seed yield in both seasons.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.78 and 24.53 q ha-1e0
Comparator
T9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield of 22.78 and 24.53 q ha-1 was obtained from T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/ha) and minimum yield 16.00 and 15.20 q ha-1 was recorded in T9 (HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/ha), during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HaNPV-Bt.K sequence produced minimum seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
16.00 and 15.20 q ha-1e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield of 22.78 and 24.53 q ha-1 was obtained from T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/ha) and minimum yield 16.00 and 15.20 q ha-1 was recorded in T9 (HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/ha), during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide had the highest benefit to cost ratio.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/hae0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.26 and 1.42e0
Comparator
T9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest benefit: cost ratio of 1.26 and 1.42 was recorded in T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/ha) and minimum benefit cost ratio 1.03 and 1.04 was recorded in T9 (HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/ha, during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HaNPV-Bt.K sequence had the minimum benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/hae0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.03 and 1.04e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest benefit: cost ratio of 1.26 and 1.42 was recorded in T1 (Flubendiamide 480 SC @200 ml/ha) and minimum benefit cost ratio 1.03 and 1.04 was recorded in T9 (HaNPV- Bt.K- Bt.K @ 250LE-1Lit-1Lit/ha, during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–105 · show in text ↑

flubendiamide · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

flubendiamide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

transgenic · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.